"Interesting. Joe's tax return says he was paid a far smaller amount... I think it was $19,000... in rent that year."
Now, that's odd. A mistake, no doubt, which our Criminal in Chief will amend his tax returns to correct. How odd that the IRS didn't already point that mistake out to him.
Truthfully, the biggest puzzle, for me, is why some element of the government felt it necessary to disclose all of this embarrassing information to begin with? They cover up evidence of far bigger embarrassments all the time. Why didn't they quietly just hustle evidence of these imbroglios to the "proper authorities" and just, for example, alter the facts to either destroy the classified documents or put them back where they "accidentally" came from?
Does anyone have an answer for that? They can hide and deny millions of mRNA injuries and deaths. They can even hide and deny a President's murder trail (and so convenient that all those people who might have been witnesses to an alternative history disappeared within a remarkably short time. EVERYONE on the inside surely knows that our Criminal in Chief, and his son, are worse than mere felons -- the people working in the US military are obviously fine with that. So what was the problem of just disappearing a few more people, or documents, or whatever? Why did it come out NOW?
And does anyone SERIOUSLY believe that the documents were coincidentally "found" in all these odd places less than one week before the November mid-terms? Really? I have a Brooklyn Bridge I'd like to sell you.
| 