« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Unsound Banking: Why Most of the World’s Banks Are Headed for Collapse 

By: Decomposed in 6TH POPE | Recommend this post (1)
Thu, 16 Mar 23 10:04 PM | 38 view(s)
Boardmark this board | 6th Edition Pope Board
Msg. 41054 of 60008
(This msg. is a reply to 41051 by Fiz)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

fizzy:

Re: “An honest banker should no more lend out demand deposit money than Allied Van and Storage should lend out the furniture you’ve paid it to store....”
Honest bankers? I don't know about THAT! There have been four central banks in the history of this nation. The first three failed in blazes of glory that each destroyed between 25% and 40% of the wealth of the country. You see, when a fractional reserve based central bank fails, it does a LOT of harm, and fractional reserve based banks ALWAYS have obligations that exceed their deposits. By a lot.

In the way back, goldsmiths would charge a fee to depositors for the use of their vaults. They'd leave their vault doors wide open for the public to see during business hours, providing assurance that the gold was actually there. At some point, when they came to believe that they'd never be asked to return all of their holdings at once, they started lending it out, keeping just enough to fool depositors into thinking that their gold was still there... and banking was born.

Here in the good ol' U.S., the government began to question some of the small, "wild cat" banks that had sprung up and began to audit their holdings. The bankers were quickly savvy to what was going on and would shuttle their gold from bank to bank, always just ahead of the stagecoaches carrying the federal auditors.

Banking dishonesty has ALWAYS been around, fizzy, and every time some do-gooder changed the rules to try to keep 'em honest, the banks would come up with a workaround to keep the change from mattering. So long as they lend out more than they've got - and they're always going to do that - there will be fraud, scandals, collapses. The only question is how long that takes and how much of the collapse will ultimately get shoved onto the taxpayers.








Avatar

Gold is $1,581/oz today. When it hits $2,000, it will be up 26.5%. Let's see how long that takes. - De 3/11/2013 - ANSWER: 7 Years, 5 Months




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Unsound Banking: Why Most of the World’s Banks Are Headed for Collapse
By: Fiz
in 6TH POPE
Thu, 16 Mar 23 9:14 PM
Msg. 41051 of 60008

http://internationalman.com/articles/unsound-banking-why-most-of-the-worlds-banks-are-headed-for-collapse/

Excerpts:
Unsound Banking: Why Most of the World’s Banks Are Headed for Collapse

by Doug Casey
Bank collapse

...
This brief article will explain why the world’s banking system is unsound, and what differentiates a sound from an unsound bank. I suspect not one person in 1,000 actually understands the difference. As a result, the world’s economy is now based upon unsound banks dealing in unsound currencies. Both have degenerated considerably from their origins.

...

Most people today are only dimly aware that until the early 1930s, gold coins were used in everyday commerce by the general public. In addition, gold backed most national currencies at a fixed rate of convertibility. Banks were just another business—nothing special. They were distinguished from other enterprises only by the fact they stored, lent, and borrowed gold coins, not as a sideline but as a primary business. Bankers had become goldsmiths without the hammers.

Bank deposits, until quite recently, fell strictly into two classes, depending on the preference of the depositor and the terms offered by banks: time deposits, and demand deposits. Although the distinction between them has been lost in recent years, respecting the difference is a critical element of sound banking practice.

Time Deposits. With a time deposit—a savings account, in essence—a customer contracts to leave his money with the banker for a specified period. In return, he receives a specified fee (interest) for his risk, for his inconvenience, and as consideration for allowing the banker the use of the depositor’s money. The banker, secure in knowing he has a specific amount of gold for a specific amount of time, is able to lend it; he’ll do so at an interest rate high enough to cover expenses (including the interest promised to the depositor), fund a loan-loss reserve, and if all goes according to plan, make a profit.

A time deposit entails a commitment by both parties. The depositor is locked in until the due date. How could a sound banker promise to give a time depositor his money back on demand and without penalty when he’s planning to lend it out?

In the business of accepting time deposits, a banker is a dealer in credit, acting as an intermediary between lenders and borrowers. To avoid loss, bankers customarily preferred to lend on productive assets, whose earnings offered assurance that the borrower could cover the interest as it came due. ...

That’s time deposits. Demand deposits were a completely different matter.

Demand Deposits. Demand deposits were so called because, unlike time deposits, they were payable to the customer on demand. These are the basis of checking accounts. The banker doesn’t pay interest on the money, because he supposedly never has the use of it; to the contrary, he necessarily charged the depositor a fee for:

Assuming the responsibility of keeping the money safe, available for immediate withdrawal, and

Administering the transfer of the money if the depositor so chooses by either writing a check or passing along a warehouse receipt that represents the gold on deposit.

An honest banker should no more lend out demand deposit money than Allied Van and Storage should lend out the furniture you’ve paid it to store....


« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next