Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Steve Kirsh's Unusual Covid Treatment Protocol from 6/22

By: Fiz in 6TH POPE | Recommend this post (0)
Wed, 22 Mar 23 3:05 PM | 23 view(s)
Boardmark this board | 6th Edition Pope Board 		Msg. 41183 of 58582
(This msg. is a reply to 41169 by Zimbler0)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

I think that is a good conjecture, Zim. I don't know if it is true...that is where the research would be required to vet the cases.

Regarding this overall issue, here are some things that came, immediately, to my mind:

(1) Healthy people breath almost exclusively through their nose. Your nose is there to filter; if you didn't need a filter you wouldn't have one.

(2) Viruses (and bacteria), in relatively small numbers, are generally harmless. They need to get concentrated into hundreds of millions, if not billions, before they stand any chance against a healthy immune system. That is, they need a BREEDING SPOT, within the host, where they are relatively protected from the host's immune system, for a time.

(3) The nose is a preferential breeding spot because
(a) lower temperature (which invaders prefer; that is why you get a fever, BTW: to kill the organisms)
(b) reduced/restricted blood flow, so the hosts full immune system doesn't have full access.

I could probably come up with some other good reasons. My point is that the lungs and the throat, and the inside of the mounth, do not have these advantages for a respiratory virus or bacteria.

That said, pneumonia may well begin directly in the lungs, I don't know. If so, that would probably be an example of your hypothesis being borne out.

But pneumonia - whether viral or bacterial - is not a cold. So I am back to my original hypothesis.

Now, what does it matter? Think about all the sick time humans go through, due to respiratory viruses, in particular, and the insane cost society bears for sick time.

And then imagine that all it took to possibly get rid of 99% of all colds, and possibly flues, was just a slight upgrade in BASIC, INEXPENSIVE, hygiene?

What would we say these days about people who didn't wash with soap and water after pooping. Who didn't disinfect wounds, nor hospitals, before "medical care"? Etc.

And what excuse do the ersatz “scientists” who work at the CDC, FDA, etc. have for not having the slightest conception -- nor curiosity in -- the basics of how diseases get started and spread.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Steve Kirsh's Unusual Covid Treatment Protocol from 6/22
By: Zimbler0 in 6TH POPE
Tue, 21 Mar 23 9:06 PM 		Msg. 41169 of 58582

De: "That's probably the case, but it's not your theory...Unfortunately, there are many other viruses that don't need to take root in the nose. You're still going to catch colds even if you use your Neti-pot diligently."

fIZ > I'm trying to make sense of your statement (figure out exactly what you mean).


For what it's worth . . .

I'm thinking that when one breathes, the 'outside air' gets sucked into the lungs - frequently through the nose. Making the nasal passages the first and most likely spot for virii or bacterium to lodge.

But the air, and possibly virii or bacterium, DOES get sucked all the way into the lungs offering the possibility for said germs to lodge in the lungs then propagate.

What are the odds that some cold germs have mutated precisely to facilitate such an 'attack vector'? I'd say pretty good.

Zim.

« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next