NPR roasted for claiming ‘limited scientific evidence’ trans women have a physical advantage
http://twitchy.com/fuzzychimp-313137/2023/03/25/npr-roasted-for-claiming-limited-scientific-evidence-trans-women-have-a-physical-advantage/
In response to a World Athletics Council decision to ban transgender athletes from competing in women’s track and field competitions, NPR made the patently absurd claim that there is ‘limited scientific evidence’ of a physical advantage for trans women (men) over women athletes.
‘Limited scientific evidence’? The folks at NPR have self-lobotomized in service to the wokesters.
We explicitly separate men’s and women’s sports because men have a physical advantage over women.
NPR (@NPR) ~ The international governing body for track and field will ban trans women athletes from elite women's competitions, citing a priority for fairness over inclusion despite limited scientific evidence of physical advantage.
http://www.npr.org/2023/03/24/1165795462/transgender-track-and-field-athletes-cant-compete-in-womens-international-events
Women’s golf tees are closer to the pin than men’s tees because men have a physical advantage over women.
WNBA basketballs are 1 inch smaller and the 3-point line is 1 foot closer because men have a physical advantage over women.
Feminism exists because men have a physical advantage over women.
We’ve got your limited scientific evidence right here, clowns.
Amy (@famousamosquito) ~ “Limited scientific evidence of physical advantage.” You’re not a serious journalistic company.
No, they are not.
Percival Cox, MD - Not a Biologist (@PerryCoxMD) ~ I’m going to enjoy this one.
Sit down and take it all in. NPR got a good old-fashioned ratio for this nonsense.
Bridget Phetasy (@BridgetPhetasy) ~ Wow if only there were evidence that men had a physical advantage over women. Too bad. I guess we will never know the truth.
It’s a shame right? How will we ever know, especially because men and women are segregated into sports based on gender?
If only there was some mechanism of tracking the results and stats of sporting events and individual athletes so they could be compared.
Alas, we shall never know.
Jen (@Jen_Vaughan) ~ “Limited scientific evidence” unless you consider that men outperform women in every single track and field event. And no, lowering testosterone does not equalize performance.
Okay, there is that.
Stephen L. Miller (@redsteeze) ~ If there really is limited scientific advantage here, then why is this always going in direction of women's sports and not men's?
Yeah, then why isn't the reverse true, eh? Why aren't LOADS of female athletes clamoring to be admitted into men's sports???!!!
‘Welcome to the NFL Combine! The scouts really have their eyes on I. P. Sittendown this afternoon ... ‘
Yeah, not going to happen. It’s science.
Hey Boo Boo (@HeyBooBoo16) ~ Sure Jan.
Too bad there’s limited scientific evidence of physical advantage.
Hmmm ... let's just take a purple-haired, overpaid, mediocre soccer player for example, shall we?
FC Dallas under-15 boys squad beat the U.S. Women's National Team in a scrimmage
http://www.cbssports.com/soccer/news/a-dallas-fc-under-15-boys-squad-beat-the-u-s-womens-national-team-in-a-scrimmage/
Megan Rapinoe (who put the HOE in Rapinoe) and her fellow soccer mates on the U.S. Women's National Soccer Team got BEAT by a bunch of 15-year-old boys. BWHA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!
Christina Pushaw (@ChristinaPushaw) ~ NPR is funded by American taxpayers despite zero scientific evidence of any benefit to society.
LOL. Good one.
Well, there's plenty ... a virtual cornucopia ... of undeniable evidence that there is NO brain activity going on in the offices of NPR.
Doug Powers (@ThePowersThatBe) ~ “Limited scientific evidence” that biological men have a physical advantage over biological women.
NPR is beyond flaming garbage at this point. There’s ZERO evidence that NPR is a news organization.
Not just flaming garbage. BEYOND flaming garbage. Ha!
At least you can warm yourself next to flaming garbage.
What purpose does NPR serve?
NPR's purpose? They're a propaganda service for the Democrat Party.[/color]
Pradheep J. Shanker (@Neoavatara) ~ This is so dishonest @NPR. There is decades of scientific evidence for physical gender disparity. Anyone saying otherwise is simply spreading scientific misinformation. Shame on you, @NPR.
Unfortunately there is limited scientific evidence that NPR can experience shame.
True. The propaganda wing of North Korea's Communist Party has more intellectual honesty than NPR.
T. Becket Adams (@BecketAdams) ~ The "despite limited scientific evidence of physical advantage" in this news blurb is positively psychotic.
Accurate. We’re sensing a trend in the opinions here.
Hunter (@IndependnTexan) ~ Why would sports be categorized by sex in the first place if there is no difference???
Right? What an odd factor by which to divide athletes.
Why not by hair color or music preference?
Yeah, Megan RapinHOE could be in the Purple Hair League. Yay!
Why do athletic organizations separate athletes based on gender? It’s like there’s some significant difference between genders that makes it necessary?
Perhaps we shall never know.
Sunny McSunnyface (@sunnyright) ~ Cool so let’s have one league for both men and women of a sport — no quotas or diversity considerations — and the strongest athletes will compete for a spot.
Surely the left will be cool with the gender composition that results.
Good plan! It’s sure to be a resounding success!
Wait ... maybe that was sarcasm ...
Polybius Champion (@PolybiusChamp) ~ So we should just eliminate women’s sports categories? Since there are no differences between men and women, Eliminate the @LPGA close down the @WNBA?
... yep, definitely sarcasm.
Hey, we won’t ever have to hear again about how WNBA players are underpaid compared to NBA players.
In fact, WNBA players will never play professional basketball again.
Andy Swan (@AndySwan) ~
Whoa. Whoa! WHOA!
You’re telling us people have collected statistics about outcomes in sports between men and women and you can just go around graphing it on charts, like all sciency and stuff?
This is a game changer!
Your Friendly Neighborhood Numbersmuncher (@NumbersMuncher) ~ Whatever your feelings are about allowing trans women athletes from competing with women, the idea that there is 'limited scientific evidence of physical advantage' is one of the dumbest things you'll ever see.
Just look at the record books for each sport between men and women.
Mind. Blown.
Yeah, NPR is that slavishly devoted to the continued charade that someone can just call themselves a woman and make it so.
Yep ... they're Woketards.
Kira (@RealKiraDavis) ~ Why is this so hard for the progressive left to admit that male bodies are stronger than female bodies? If being trans is the result of being born in the wrong body then how can you say that there’s no difference between the two bodies. Why even transition at all then?
A question that Democrats are too stupid to even entertain.
There is limited scientific evidence that progressives employ logic.
Tom Cotton (@TomCottonAR) ~ NPR has become a parody of itself.
Too bad that the people at NPR don't even comprehend the concept of parody.
It’s the publicly-funded unintentional Babylon Bee.
GiraffinMeCrazy (@GiraffinC) ~ {Replying to @NPR} You clearly have not laid off enough people.
Well there’s your problem!
The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted. ~ D.H. Lawrence
| 
