Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
Replies to Msg. #1222749
.
 Msg. #  Subject Posted by    Board    Date   
42177 Re: Total Nuclear Death is NOW Available on Steam! War time simulator run at Princeton & The Pentagon
   >>> A 2022 study published in Nature found that even 5 Tg of soot fro... 		Zimbler0   6TH POPE   02 May 2023
 1:39 AM
42162 Re: Total Nuclear Death is NOW Available on Steam! War time simulator run at Princeton & The Pentagon
   [img]https://media1.tenor.com/images/ed059f472dfd77b8fc0e7f6f5bf9e61c/... 		ribit   6TH POPE   01 May 2023
 5:51 AM

The above list shows replies to the following message:

Total Nuclear Death is NOW Available on Steam! War time simulator run at Princeton & The Pentagon

By: Fiz in 6TH POPE
Mon, 01 May 23 3:17 AM
Msg. 42160 of 60008
Jump to msg. #  

I'm excited to tell you, I now have a bunker 35 feet underground! I stocked it with survival food this weekend. I hope you have yours.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2023-04-30/total-nuclear-death

The Ultimate Catastrophe

Thirty-three years ago, Playboy magazine asked Donald Trump what would be on his mind if he became President some day. Trump's response? The "ultimate catastrophe", nuclear war:

What would be some of President Trump’s longer-term views of the future?
I think of the future, but I refuse to paint it. Anything can happen. But I often think of nuclear war.

Nuclear war?
Trump: "I’ve always thought about the issue of nuclear war; it’s a very important element in my thought process. It’s the ultimate, the ultimate catastrophe, the biggest problem this world has, and nobody’s focusing on the nuts and bolts of it. It’s a little like sickness. People don’t believe they’re going to get sick until they do. Nobody wants to talk about it. I believe the greatest of all stupidities is people’s believing it will never happen, because everybody knows how destructive it will be, so nobody uses weapons. What bullshit."

Unfortunately, our current leadership has been less concerned about nuclear war, and has increased the risk of one happening via its proxy war against Russia in the Ukraine. Media attention seems to have shifted somewhat from the war after the recent leaks suggested the tide had turned against the Ukrainians, but a recent news item highlighted the continuing risk that it could spark a nuclear war.

US Sends "Shadowy Unit" Of Atomic Experts To Wire Ukraine With Nuke-Blast-Detecting Sensors https://t.co/C3Ag6u8u75
— zerohedge (@zerohedge) April 28, 2023

Maybe part of the problem is, contra Trump, our current leadership has forgotten how destructive a nuclear war would be. I have a reminder for them below, an excerpt from a powerful post detailing exactly what would happen in a nuclear exchange between Russia and the United States.

Total Nuclear Death

I’ve recently been playing around with Nuclear War Simulator which is exactly like it sounds: less a game and more a tool. Originally used by researchers at Princeton and the Pentagon, it’s now available on Steam. Here there are no points to win, only scenarios to run: each one terrifying in both scale and particulars. Did you know that today’s ICBMs carry up to ten warheads each? Each warhead, typically 30 times more powerful than the bomb dropped on Hiroshima, can be independently targeted to strike a different city, or the same city if you really want to be sure the job is done. Russia has an arsenal of at least 400 such missiles in addition to nuclear weapons carried on bombers or submarines, for an estimated total of 5,977 warheads as of 2022. The United States has 5,428. All of these are available to you in Nuclear War Simulator, where you can push a button to launch them in great curving arcs over the Arctic Circle to rain down nuclear fire from the stratosphere on Russian and American cities below.

Once the bombs have dropped, you can run casualty simulations to see the death totals in fine-grained detail. There are myriad ways to die when getting nuked: instant radiation burns, crushed in falling buildings, burned in the good old-fashioned type of fires which would rage through the wreckage after being ignited by the heat of the blast, or death from radiation poisoning from lingering fallout carried on the wind. To make things terrifyingly personal, you can even place icons on the map representing friends and family and watch how they’d fare if positioned in a car, in a basement under a concrete building, or ominously “in the open.”
“I began (like many of us) to wonder in my idle moments whether my house was within the blast radius of a Russian bomb.”

So obviously, in this day of heightened tension with Russia, when we learn through a zoomer whistleblower that US forces are significantly more engaged with fighting Russia in Ukraine than the public, and maybe even Congress, had been led to believe, I began (like many of us) to wonder in my idle moments whether my house was within the blast radius of a Russian bomb. There are various kinds of hypothetical scenarios involving the use of nuclear weapons, including those in which the nations involved decide to target the enemy’s population centers instead of merely just their military forces. To get a sense of the greatest possible destruction, this MAX DEATH scenario was the one I chose to run. Results discussed below:
(continued)

A 2022 study published in Nature found that even 5 Tg of soot from burning cities, fuel stores, and forest fires would be enough to cause global famine. With so many nations dependent on food imports, even a modest disruption of crop production and shipping capability would have large effects. More extreme scenarios with more soot predict up to 5 billion lives lost from starvation. In the simulation I ran, which accounted for only destruction in the United States, soot totals were calculated to be at 20 Tg. With Russia included, soot totals could easily be at least double.