http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQMPNLyCKow Inteview.
He denounced the mRNA vaccines early on, when it took enormous courage to do that publicly. In this regard he was more courageous and intelligent and honest than Trump, by a million miles.
He is against the idiot wars which make America weaker.
He recognizes the Durham report as the truth. Many Civil Servants conspired to subvert and election.
He wants to convince Democrats that they aren't Democrats and Republicans that they aren't Republicans. He wants reconciliation (which is difficult for me to personally swallow as even possible, but I think is worth a try.
I generally favor his environmental and agricultural positions (Subsidize regenerative agricultural practices, not conventional farming). I have some concerns about his continuing to throttle oil and mineral extraction; on the other hand, I think a lot more can gainfully be done to switch to alternatives which will better preserve the environment, likely at lower overall costs. These extractions clearly are finite, after all, and do have externalized costs which are currently being dumped on the average citizen.
Will I like everything about his positions? No, of course not. But I think he is honest and he is clearly -- maybe even more clearly than with Trump -- NOT a tool of the Uniparty and Globalists. Even more clearly than Trump, he seeks smaller government intrusion and more freedom for the avearge American.
He's extremely well spoken, and literate, even if his voice is very gravelly (I presume he had or has a medical condition).
What do YOU disagree with SUPER STRONGLY about his positions? Maybe you can convince me to change my mind?
| 
