I am endorsing RFK Jr. for Presidential nomination on the Democratic Ticket. I'm probably going to donate money.
So per this, 20% of Democratic voters are interested in RFK. And roughly 1/3 want anyone but Joe Biden:
http://nypost.com/2023/06/06/rfk-jr-has-the-white-house-sweating-and-rightly-so/.
Stopping Biden/Harris/Demonrat Deep-State as currently established is my #1, #2, and #3 biggest concerns. RFK Jr. has considerable potential to do that -- arguably far more potential to do that than Trump.
Other than RFK's position on US oil production (which can hardly be worse than Joe Biden's/DemonRat standard), I am not aware of any area, at least not yet, where I disagree strenuously with RFK.
I DO appreciate his unequivocally strong stance against both the (1) Forever Wars and (2) mRNA vaccines.
On the former, he is at least as much against Ukraine proxy war as Trump (basically a tie, I'd say). RFK is much more definite than Trump on the Criminality/Stupidity of Covid mRNA gene therapy and Big Pharma influence/criminality in general.
Indeed, Trump is 100% responsible for that Crime Against Humanity and Scientific IDIOCY. And he hasn't said much by way of apology. (Although I did hear him say in a recent rumble speech, that he is no friend of Big Pharma and intends to go after them if elected, so that is a step in the right direction—although less of a step than DeSantis has taken and way short of RFK Jr.).
I read the previously posted article from De which calls RFK Jr. a F****** Commie". The guy either can't write well. Or can't think well. Or both. I'd suggest both.... He wastes valuable space foaming at the mouth about Commie and Conservative, but appears functionally incapable of defining either term or mounting a cogent argument. When all a person can do is is insult and throw around terms -- without apparently being capable of explaining nor defining -- I have a term for that: "Functional Idiot": someone who appears able to talk but not rationally convince nor evolve.
Current ChatBots write, think, and self-upgrade their errors better than many of today's "journalists" and talking-heads, unfortunately.
Anyway, the TL;DR: RFK Jr. is no more a "Commie" than President John F. Kennedy was. And JFK faced down the USSR and paid with his life for his independent thinking. Their political positions, indeed, and rational courage in facing down the Deep State/Powers that Be, seem more alike than different as far as I can tell. And I can live with long-established basic integrity and thoughtfulness way better than I can with rabid, untrustworthy behaviors.
And, to state the obvious: Democrats appear to have at least as big a chance of taking the Presidency as any Republican, and arguably MORE chance. I think I can be happy enough with RFK Jr.'s environmentalism, given his courageously displayed integrity and ability to rationally approach our other problems.
And I am kind of an environmentalist anyway; at least I favor preserving nature and holding Corporations responsible for a lot more of their externalized societal harms. That is what I mean by "conservative" -- which is not that different from traditional, independent, self-governing American.
And possession is "9/10ths of the law"; and more than 9/10ths of what actually matters in current elections. Again, Democrats and Republicans are about equally matched in terms of dependable voters. Elections are almost entirely determined by INDEPENDENTS. Thank God, bloodthirsty, cowardly Neocons are a distinct minority. Hopefully, if we start insisting they go take a bullet to prove their integrity, before we offer them any government job, we can clean up the gene pool within a few generations. And get back to no standing army and "Land of the Free, Home of the Brave".
| 
