Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: RFK Jr. says he would sign an assault weapons ban

By: micro in 6TH POPE | Recommend this post (0)
Fri, 30 Jun 23 4:39 PM | 23 view(s)
Boardmark this board | 6th Edition Pope Board 		Msg. 43994 of 60008
(This msg. is a reply to 43986 by Decomposed)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

amen to that De!!!

Well stated.

If it were not for citizens being armed, we would still be an English colony and servants to England..

Despots and abusers come in all kinds of clothing and educational levels and Family names.

They ALL are evil.. No matter their pedigree.

I am not suggesting RFK is a despot or evil, but if he is in favor of gun grabbing, well, he should go read the Constitution a little better about the 2nd amendment.

It does not give the exception to cherry pick one type of gun at a time and those things Dems call assault rifles is a bunch of BS. They wouldn't know an assault rifle if it was fired at them.. I know the sound of AK47's very well. I was shot at by them.

I have ZERO respect or tolerance for gun grabbers of ANY party or pedigree.

So helpfully your candidate can clarify whether he is another gun grabbibng, 2nd amendment violating Liberal in sheeps clothing that are not a very good disguise??

Thanks!

micro..

» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: RFK Jr. says he would sign an assault weapons ban
By: Decomposed in 6TH POPE
Fri, 30 Jun 23 2:06 PM 		Msg. 43986 of 60008

fizzy:

Re: “Those are a lot of obstacles in the way of anything getting signed, which should give all concerned some counsel.”No, it's NOT a lot of obstacles. Obama could have banned semi-automatic weapons in 2010 through the mechanism you so casually describe and support. He could have even described his action as bipartisan with the help of just one or two RINO allies.

What we're talking about is a clear violation of one of our Constitutional rights. It's not supposed to be permissible except by first amending the Constitution. This occurs at the State level, not through Federal overreach. I am frankly shocked that you're okay with weakening our rights through unConstitutional action.

Gun rights protect our country from enemies both foreign and domestic. Without them, odds are good that all of our rights would go away. They are the citizens' only and last defense against tyranny.

« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next