Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: RFK Jr on Guns FIZ 

By: micro in 6TH POPE | Recommend this post (2)
Sun, 02 Jul 23 2:05 AM | 39 view(s)
Boardmark this board | 6th Edition Pope Board 		Msg. 44046 of 58497
(This msg. is a reply to 44045 by Fiz)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Hi Fiz!

I just stopped by for a few moments and was reading and came across this: 

even IF he gets elected and IF Republicans flip sides to pass an Assault Weapons ban?
[b]

Here is the troubling part of this statement to people who know how to use and are well trained in the use of firearms of all types.

The WORD ASSAULT WEAPONS keeps popping up. Want to bet whether or not RFK Jr. actually knows what an Assault weapon really is versus a fancy looking AR 15 with a scope that if ya pulls the trigger only one round gets fired????

Too many ignorant politicians are so intent on "BANNING" "ASSAULT RIFLES" and have ZERO, no, LESS than zero clue about what an actual asault rifle really is versus a nice sporty looking AR 14 or 15 that looks a lot better as a single shot, one squeeze of trigger and one round is fired, than anything that has been around a long time.
Because it LOOKS really neat and so many are purchased these are the rifles these dumb asses who are anti-gun keep referring to.

ASSAULT WEAPONS are things you would find in the military that are fully automatic.

SO what these politicians really mean in their gun banning is that they intend to introduce legislation and by hook or by crook make buying a common hunting rifle like an AR 14 or 15 impossible because they look really cool. So the gun grab is on whether you realize it or not due to sheer and utter IGNORANCE and STUPIDITY on the part of these people, Including RFK Jr. That dumb sob wouldn;t know an assault weapon if it kicked him the arse.

He should stick to talking what he knows about and what he does not know about, he needs to get educated about that by real people who actually use them before he decides his mission in life is to ban "assault " weapons".

Assault weapons are not available to the general public as it is.. SO, another dumb politician is willing to take my guns away because he is a moron and a fool. And anti-American to boot because he apparently thinks the second amendmnet is not necessary..

So, that is what I get out of it.. No, he does not have lots of leeway. He should be crystal clear about people'
s rights to possess and bear arms period. No ifs, ands, maybes, or buts.

This is all I am going to say because it is a point that one cannot be a weasel on and not even know what the heck they are talking about..

Shame on him.. Another flaming gun banning libtard.


 - - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: RFK Jr on Guns
By: Fiz in 6TH POPE
Sun, 02 Jul 23 12:35 AM 		Msg. 44045 of 58497

Zim>And do not forget the RFK Jr stated that he WOULD sign off on a ban of 'assault weapons' - A clear violation of the Second Amendment."

I don't have a problem with what he said re 'assault weapons', and I listened to the whole thing. As I said, he defended 2nd Amendment at pretty good length to begin with. Then he said "IF BOTH SIDES OF CONGRESS" send me a bill...

So he's got lots of leeway before that should be an issue. And if he wins the Presidency (BIG "if") it means he will have a lot of Democrats backing him, and open to his preferences.

Anyway, I think you are putting the cart about a thousand miles in front of the horse. Why don't you worry more about what he MIGHT do about the 2nd Amendment after he defeats Biden -- and just support his candidacy until then? Unless you like Biden, better, that is.

And don't you think the Republican super majority in the Supreme Court might have something to say about the issue, even IF he gets elected and IF Republicans flip sides to pass an Assault Weapons ban?

And, at the end of the day, as De pointed out, Assault weapons aren't clearly defined. That could be bad, of course, but a definition will have to be agreed to. And I expect ther are some guns I am okay with banning.

But, Zim, I never expected you to give up those wars you LOVE so much. So Kennedy couldn't get your vote, anyway. Indeed, I don't even believe you really will support Trump, this time around, and maybe not even the last time, for that very reason.

Trump has made crystal clear that he will end US shipping weapons to Ukraine on day one. Isn't that a showstopper for you??

If not, why not?

« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next