« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: What Could Possible go wrong?

By: Zimbler0 in 6TH POPE | Recommend this post (0)
Sun, 02 Jul 23 3:23 AM | 21 view(s)
Boardmark this board | 6th Edition Pope Board
Msg. 44052 of 58497
(This msg. is a reply to 44049 by CTJ)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

What could go wrong . . . Let me see . . .

If 'something' is done and it can not quickly and easily be undone. . . We could have a catastrophic loss of food plants. Followed by starvation.

Reflect a LOT more solar radiation than anticipated . . . And we could conceivably bring on another ice age.

But the thing that pizzes me the most, is the fact that NOBODY on this planet can truthfully tell what the climate has been doing short term . . . Let alone what the long term prognosis for this planets climate is.

Zim.




Avatar

Mad Poet Strikes Again.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
What Could Possible go wrong?
By: CTJ
in 6TH POPE
Sun, 02 Jul 23 2:42 AM
Msg. 44049 of 58497

The White House has opened the door to a plan to block sunlight from hitting the surface of the Earth in a bid to halt global warming.

Despite some scientists warning the effort could have untold side effects from altering the chemical makeup of the atmosphere, President Joe Biden's administration have admitted they're open to the idea, which has never been attempted before.

In a report released Friday by the White House, officials suggested limiting sunlight to rapidly cool the planet, a process known as solar radiation modification (SRM).

The administration added a note of skepticism to the report by noting that Congress ordered it, insisting it has not made any decision on 'geoengineering' policy.

The report noted several ways authorities could look to achieve SRM, all of which come with potentially devastating consequences if they backfire.

One method would be to significantly increase the amount of aerosols in the stratosphere, which would reflect the sun's rays from the planet.

Other ideas floated included increasing cloud coverage over oceans, or reducing the amount of cirrus cloud formations, which reflect solar radiation back to the Earth.

The report noted that undertaking the mammoth task could have severe ramifications weather patterns and food supplies, which would in turn impact biodiversity, geopolitics, and health.

It also suggested that committing to the idea then backtracking and changing course could lead to abrupt warming as the suns rays suddenly heat the Earth once more.

While insisting that it was not definitively moving ahead with the plan, the Biden administration insisted in its report that the idea appeared promising.

It said a 'program of research' into the practice would 'enable better-informed decisions about the potential risks and benefits' of blocking the sun.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12254167/More-gloomy-news-Biden-backs-plan-BLOCK-sunlight-Earth-bid-limit-global-warming.html


« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next