Msg. 44067 of 58497 (This msg. is a reply to
44055 by
Decomposed)
Jump:
>>>
Apparently, they don’t think that black people are smart enough to get into college on merit alone, which is truly tragic.
>>>
Actually,
Very few black people are smart enough to get into college on merit alone. Tragically. Worse still, it is not really the kids fault - it is the fault of their parents and EVERY Black 'leader' who has failed to recognize that a good education is the first step in achieving the 'economic equity' the scream they want.
Asians are bent on seeing their children get all the education they can handle - possibly even at a younger age than most kids could handle. Many Asian parents are seeing that their children become 'educational overachievers'.
Most white parents read to their little ones. Meaning they go to first grade with a much improved vocabulary and they know what books are all about. Ready for first grade when they get there.
Black kids? Far too many blacks are born in father-less households. Many black mothers take the attitude that 'the school is supposed to teach our children everything they need to know'. So most of them get to first grade with a limited vocabulary and no idea what a book is all about. Too many black kids, by the time they reach high school they are ready to cop an attitude of their own - 'getting educated is acting white'.
Why do I believe the above?
Standardized test scores for one. Back when I was reading the newspaper religiously, every few years or so the local paper would print the scores - broken down by race. The blacks were always ten to twenty percent behind the whites. Who were themselves two to five percent behind the asians.
I also read in an article not that long ago (may have been referring to the Supreme Court case) where blacks being admitted to 'prestigious universities' had SAT scores a fair ways below what the asians and whites being denied admissions had.
Here is an article obviously written by liveral retards . . . But it gives facts to back up the above.
>>>
SAT math scores mirror and maintain racial inequity
We investigate SAT scores by race using the College Board’s publicly available data for over 2.1 million 2020 high school graduates, with a particular focus on the math section. (This analysis builds on our earlier work on this issue from 2017, “Race gaps in SAT scores highlight inequality and hinder upward mobility.”)
The class of 2020 averaged a score of 523 of 800 on the math section of the SAT, slightly below the College Board’s college-readiness benchmark score of 530. (The College Board predicts that the average SAT test taker will earn less than a C in their first-year math course.) The average scores for Black (454) and Latino or Hispanic students (47 are significantly lower than those of white (547) and Asian students (632).
>>>
Now I do not believe that blacks (or hispanics) can not learn enough to score high enough and go to college.
But I also do not believe our 'prestigious universities' should be aggressively recruiting academically challenged imbeciles KNOWING that they do not have the necessary skill sets to succeed in college.
And I also believe our 'federal student loan program' is a BIG part of the problem. Recruit the idiots, lard them up with 'student loans'. Hand out diplomas like candy and grant 'degrees' not worth the paper they were printed on. Then when 'they' get out into the real world 'corporate' has to find out (the hard way) that the clown they just hired can not do the job.
In 2003, the Supreme Court ruled in Grutter v. Bollinger that an admissions process that gives preference to “underrepresented minority groups” does not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Affirmative action began under President Lyndon B. Johnson. If you want to argue that such a policy was necessary at that point in our history, you could probably make a reasonable case. But such a policy could never be permanent. At some point, America had to progress to the point where such a policy was no longer necessary. In fact, in her majority opinion, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor said just that. Despite the court’s condoning of racial preferences, O’Connor wrote, “The Court expects that 25 years from now, the use of racial preferences will no longer be necessary to further the interest approved today.”
On Thursday, the Supreme Court finally ruled that race-based admissions do, in fact, violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment in its rulings in Students for Fair Admissions vs. Harvard and Students for Fair Admissions vs. the University of North Carolina. Justice O’Connor was only off by six years.
Radical leftists are, of course, freaking out. “Every child deserves a chance to chase their American Dream,” tweeted Nancy Pelosi. “Yet sadly, today’s Supreme Court ruling narrows access to higher education & the crucial ladder of opportunity that it provides. Its impact will be felt imminently, diminishing hard-fought progress for racial justice.”
“The Supreme Court ruling has put a giant roadblock in our country’s march for racial justice,” Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said in a statement. “The consequences of this decision will be felt immediately and across the country, as students of color will face an admission cycle next year with fewer opportunities to attend the same colleges and universities than their parents and older siblings.”
Apparently, they don’t think that black people are smart enough to get into college on merit alone, which is truly tragic. If there’s anything we can infer from their statements and the statements of many others on the left, is that, unlike Justice O’Connor, they didn’t see race-based policy admissions to be a temporary fix. For them, there will always be racial injustice justifying tipping the scales in favor of minorities at the expense of white Americans.
Let’s not forget that, five years after Grutter v. Bollinger, America elected the first black president of the United States. He may have been an awful president, but if there was any milestone that should have put the issue of affirmative action to rest, that was it. Yet it still took another 15 years before the Supreme Court finally did the right thing. From where I sit, this day was long overdue.
Make no mistake about it: the doom and gloom that the radical left is predicting isn’t going to happen. In fact, most Americans believe the country is ready to turn the page on affirmative action. According to a 2022 Pew Research poll, 73% of Americans are opposed to colleges and universities considering race or ethnicity in student admissions decisions. Only 19% believe it should be a minor factor, and merely 7% consider it a major factor. Even minorities are opposed to affirmative action. The same poll revealed that 62% of black Americans, 65% of Hispanic Americans, and 58% of Asian Americans do not believe race or ethnicity should play a role in admissions.
America is ready for colorblind admissions. Just because the Democrats aren’t doesn’t mean that we should listen to them.
DON'T BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS WEBSITE!
The reader is responsible for discerning the validity, factuality or implications of information posted here, be it fictional or based on real events. Moderators on this forum make every effort to review the material posted on this site however, it is not realistically possible for a one man team to manually review each and every one of the posts atomicbobs.com gets on a daily basis.
The content of posts on this site, including but not limited to links to other web sites, are the expressed opinion of the original poster and are in no way representative of or endorsed by the owners or administration of this website. The posts on this website are the opinion of the specific author and are not statements of advice, opinion, or factual information on behalf of the owner or administration of Atomicbobs. This site may contain adult language, if you feel you might be offended by such content, you should log off immediately.
Not all posts on this website are intended as truthful or factual assertion by their authors. Some users of this website are participating in internet role playing, with or without the use of an avatar. NO post on this website should be considered factual information on face value alone. Users are encouraged to
USE DISCERNMENT
and do their own follow up research while reading and posting on this website. Atomicbobs.com reserves the right to make changes to, corrections and/or remove entirely at any time posts made on this website without notice. In addition, Atomicbobs.com disclaims any and all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of a post on this website.
This website implements certain security features in order to prevent spam and posting abuse. By making a post on this website you consent to any automated security checks required by our system to authenticate your IP address as belonging to an actual human. It is forbidden to make posts on this website from open proxy servers. By making a post on this website you consent to an automated one time limited port scan of your IP address which is required by our security system to validate the authenticity of your internet connection.
This site is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. You should not assume that this site is error-free or that it will be suitable for the particular purpose which you have in mind when using it. In no event shall Atomicbobs.com be liable for any special, incidental, indirect or consequential damages of any kind, or any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
Some events depicted in certain posting and threads on this website may be fictitious and any similarity to any person living or dead is merely coincidental. Some other articles may be based on actual events but which in certain cases incidents, characters and timelines have been changed for dramatic purposes. Certain characters may be composites, or entirely fictitious.
We do not discriminate against the mentally ill!
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to civil rights, economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science & technology, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
At some point freedom of speech and copyright law merge. The following interpretation of "Fair Use" and subsequent posting policy were developed with the assistance of qualified legal council however, we are not lawyers and cannot offer you legal advise as to the limits of "Fair Use"
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
Though legally each situation is evaluated independently according to guidelines that were intentionally left open to interpretation, we believe generally this policy represents "Fair Use" of any such copyrighted material for the purposes of education and discussion.
You are responsible for what you "publish" on the internet. You must be sure any copyrighted material you choose to post for discussion on this forum falls within the limits of "Fair Use" as defined by the law.
If you are a legal copyright holder or a designated agent for such and you believe a post on this website falls outside the boundaries of "Fair Use" and legitimately infringes on yours or your clients copyright
we may be contacted concerning copyright matters at:
If you require a courier address please send a fax or email and we will provide you with the required information.
For expedited human review & removal of potential copyright violations we encourage users & copyright holders to utilize the "Report Copyright Violation" button that accompanies each post published on this website.
In accordance with section 512 of the U.S. Copyright Act our contact information has been registered with the United States Copyright Office. "Safe Harbor" noticing procedures as outlined in the DMCA apply to this website concerning all 3rd party posts published herein.
If notice is given of an alleged copyright violation we will act expeditiously to remove or disable access to the material(s) in question. It is our strict policy to disable access to accounts of repeat copyright violators. We will also ban the IP address of repeat offenders from future posting on this website with or without a registered account.
All 3rd party material posted on this website is copyright the respective owners / authors. Atomicbobs.com makes no claim of copyright on such material.
Please be aware any communications sent complaining about a post on this website may be posted publicly at the discretion of the administration.
---
DON'T BREAK THE LAW!
---
Other than that you can do / say whatever you want on this forum.
We reserve the right to block access to this website by any individual or organization at any time for any reason whatsoever or no reason at all.
| 
are significantly lower than those of white (547) and Asian students (632).