http://twitchy.com/dougp/2023/08/24/for-some-reason-bidens-not-using-title-of-significant-piece-of-legislation-he-signed-last-year-n2386556
It's been just over a year since President Biden signed a "significant piece of clean energy legislation" into law, and we're starting to think the White House is really hoping we've all forgotten what it was called:
Joe Biden (@JoeBiden) ~ I signed the most significant piece of clean energy legislation—the single largest investment combating the existential threat of climate change anywhere in the world.
Not a single Republican voted for it.
Brandon can't bring himself to say it 'cuz ...
No Republicans voted for it, KJP -- or whoever wrote that -- because it had nothing to do with reducing inflation (quite the contrary if anything) and was loaded with "clean energy" sham spending.
Oh, didn't the law have a name besides "significant piece of legislation"? Yes, it did:
JodahCapashen (@JCapashen) ~ Yeah, didn't you also call it the Inflation Reduction Act to get it passed because you knew it wouldn't otherwise.
Andy Corwin (@awcorwin) ~ But wait - I thought it was an Inflation Reduction Act?
Raleigh Emry (@EmryRaleigh) ~ At the time you boasted it was for inflation reduction and that rationale was, of course, doomed to fail. If you change the subject and call it combating climate change, it's still a red herring. No sane person should have voted for it ... or proposed it.
Government is never your friend (@Hologram_9) ~ If it was "clean energy" legislation, why was it called The Inflation Reduction Act? Are you saying it will not actually reduce inflation and that name was just to fool us?
It fooled just enough people, apparently.
You had to be a complete ignorant moron to mindlessly scarf up this turd, swallow it, and vote FOR this obviously fraudulent legislation ... so, naturally, Democrats voted for it and Republicans voted against it.
The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted. ~ D.H. Lawrence
| 