Msg. 45408 of 60008 (This msg. is a reply to
45395 by
Decomposed)
Jump:
>>>
gold has never actually been proven inferior to fiat.
>>>
What does one call it when 'Good as gold' ETF's are 'trading' more gold than actually exists? (Sounds like fiat to me.)
And then from what I've been reading the 'BRICs' have NOT been talking about 'gold based currency' - nor are they talking about a 'new currency'. No new currency as that would require a new 'central bank' and that would mean surrendering some of their sovereignty to said bank.
What BRIC's seems to be talking about is moving to 'other currencies' - as in Brazil and China trading in each others currencies . . . Russian oil selling in rubles . . .
And yes, more than a few countries would love to see the end of the 'dollar dominance' . . . But the problem remains - who's currency is liquid enough and trustworthy enough for the job.
>>>
He writes that “this rather upside-down theory appealed to politicians” because “it gave them carte blanche to spend, all with money created out of thin air by the central bank.”
>>>
And right here the author points out one of the two reasons no polotician is going to go for a gold standard.
1.) Under a gold standard inflating fiat currency will get a LOT harder (for them).
2.) Under a gold standard the shortage or oversupply will wreak more havoc upon the economies than 'they' can stomach.
And do not forget that joe biden is wrecking the Dollar and the American economy . . . So, once again, I ask - "Which currency is liquid enough and trustworthy enough to do the job?"
The U.S.-led West will soon witness the end of the dollar’s preeminent position in international trade, and all of fiat will follow, writes Patrick Barron on behalf of The Mises Institute, which endorses the Austrian school of economics in the tradition of Ludwig von Mises.
Barron says the recent BRICS summit in Johannesburg, South Africa, included “an agreement on a first step toward establishing an alternative international trade settlement system based on commodities, which would certainly include gold.”
“Although the coming change may be characterized as one between the Western democracies and the BRICS nations, the real battle is one of ideas—between Keynesian economic theory and gold,” he writes. “The winner will be gold.”
Barron argues that even with the end of Bretton Woods in 1971, gold has never actually been proven inferior to fiat. “The gold standard was not replaced by a better monetary system,” he says. “It was suppressed in stages to satisfy the state’s insatiable need for money—first to make war and then to corrupt the people via welfare. The result, of course, has been never-ending wars, a creeping expansion of the welfare state, unsustainable public deficits, and the accelerating debasement of the currency.”
He points out that the debasement of the fiat dollar “has lowered its purchasing power to gold by 98 percent since 1971,” and says that the sanctions against Russia following the invasion of Ukraine, including the freezing of Russian-owned assets and their banning from the dollar-based SWIFT interbank settlement system, has accelerated the shift toward an alternative system.
“Introducing gold into the trading system will expose the main fallacy of Keynesian economics: the elevation of aggregate demand to prominence in a nation’s economy rather than production—the only means of satisfying the demand in the first place,” Barron writes. “Keynes elevated the concept of ‘aggregate demand’ over production, while Jean-Baptiste Say shows that production is required in order to enjoy the benefits of consumption.”
He writes that “this rather upside-down theory appealed to politicians” because “it gave them carte blanche to spend, all with money created out of thin air by the central bank.”
Barron says that the new settlement system for international trade will require settlement in gold,” and that the advantages of this new system “will become obvious to every nation, not just the current BRICS members.”
“The political benefit is that no one nation can control or manipulate the system for its unearned benefit,” he writes. “The economic benefit is that government spending will be minimized so that resources can be allocated to production rather than state aggrandizement. A member can expand imports only by expanding exports. This puts market pressure on member governments to reform their internal economies in order to increase production.”
Barron says that increasing demand artificially “would be counterproductive because gold would drain from the nation’s gold settlement account,” which would result in the suspension of imports, so the gold-based system “encourages sound economic practices within its members’ individual economies.”
He argues that the social democracies of the developed world, and the U.S. in particular, will find themselves at a disadvantage in a gold-based monetary and trade system. “Nations like the United States, who have huge welfare obligations and who have politically connected industries that do not add to the nation’s capital base, will struggle,” he says. “Having lots of nuclear weapons will be irrelevant, and having bases around the world will be liabilities rather than assets.”
“[O]ver time, the gold settlement system for international trade will expand into the members’ internal monetary systems,” Barron concludes. “In other words, fiat currencies—which can be inflated or debased by governments—will be thrown on the ash heap of history. Instead of Keynes’s predictions in 1924 of the gold standard, the fiat currencies will instead become the ‘barbarous relics’ themselves.”
“It’s not an alternative to SWIFT,” South African finance minister Enoch Godongwana said of the potential BRICS payment platform. “It is a payment system which facilitates a deepening of the use of local currencies.”
But with Russia assuming the BRICS chairmanship on Jan. 1, the finance minister’s mandate would seem to set Putin up for a major de-dollarization announcement when Russia hosts the next BRICS summit in October of next year, or perhaps even a new gold-backed trade currency for the bloc.
And any developments on this front, whether it takes the form of a payment platform to intermediate between local currencies, or the new trade currency itself, would be even more significant at next year’s summit, as the bloc has more than doubled its membership and has added major oil exporters Saudi Arabia, UAE, and Iran, threatening the greenback’s ‘petrodollar’ status which many consider the lynchpin of U.S. control over the global monetary system.
DON'T BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS WEBSITE!
The reader is responsible for discerning the validity, factuality or implications of information posted here, be it fictional or based on real events. Moderators on this forum make every effort to review the material posted on this site however, it is not realistically possible for a one man team to manually review each and every one of the posts atomicbobs.com gets on a daily basis.
The content of posts on this site, including but not limited to links to other web sites, are the expressed opinion of the original poster and are in no way representative of or endorsed by the owners or administration of this website. The posts on this website are the opinion of the specific author and are not statements of advice, opinion, or factual information on behalf of the owner or administration of Atomicbobs. This site may contain adult language, if you feel you might be offended by such content, you should log off immediately.
Not all posts on this website are intended as truthful or factual assertion by their authors. Some users of this website are participating in internet role playing, with or without the use of an avatar. NO post on this website should be considered factual information on face value alone. Users are encouraged to
USE DISCERNMENT
and do their own follow up research while reading and posting on this website. Atomicbobs.com reserves the right to make changes to, corrections and/or remove entirely at any time posts made on this website without notice. In addition, Atomicbobs.com disclaims any and all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of a post on this website.
This website implements certain security features in order to prevent spam and posting abuse. By making a post on this website you consent to any automated security checks required by our system to authenticate your IP address as belonging to an actual human. It is forbidden to make posts on this website from open proxy servers. By making a post on this website you consent to an automated one time limited port scan of your IP address which is required by our security system to validate the authenticity of your internet connection.
This site is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. You should not assume that this site is error-free or that it will be suitable for the particular purpose which you have in mind when using it. In no event shall Atomicbobs.com be liable for any special, incidental, indirect or consequential damages of any kind, or any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
Some events depicted in certain posting and threads on this website may be fictitious and any similarity to any person living or dead is merely coincidental. Some other articles may be based on actual events but which in certain cases incidents, characters and timelines have been changed for dramatic purposes. Certain characters may be composites, or entirely fictitious.
We do not discriminate against the mentally ill!
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to civil rights, economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science & technology, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
At some point freedom of speech and copyright law merge. The following interpretation of "Fair Use" and subsequent posting policy were developed with the assistance of qualified legal council however, we are not lawyers and cannot offer you legal advise as to the limits of "Fair Use"
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
Though legally each situation is evaluated independently according to guidelines that were intentionally left open to interpretation, we believe generally this policy represents "Fair Use" of any such copyrighted material for the purposes of education and discussion.
You are responsible for what you "publish" on the internet. You must be sure any copyrighted material you choose to post for discussion on this forum falls within the limits of "Fair Use" as defined by the law.
If you are a legal copyright holder or a designated agent for such and you believe a post on this website falls outside the boundaries of "Fair Use" and legitimately infringes on yours or your clients copyright
we may be contacted concerning copyright matters at:
If you require a courier address please send a fax or email and we will provide you with the required information.
For expedited human review & removal of potential copyright violations we encourage users & copyright holders to utilize the "Report Copyright Violation" button that accompanies each post published on this website.
In accordance with section 512 of the U.S. Copyright Act our contact information has been registered with the United States Copyright Office. "Safe Harbor" noticing procedures as outlined in the DMCA apply to this website concerning all 3rd party posts published herein.
If notice is given of an alleged copyright violation we will act expeditiously to remove or disable access to the material(s) in question. It is our strict policy to disable access to accounts of repeat copyright violators. We will also ban the IP address of repeat offenders from future posting on this website with or without a registered account.
All 3rd party material posted on this website is copyright the respective owners / authors. Atomicbobs.com makes no claim of copyright on such material.
Please be aware any communications sent complaining about a post on this website may be posted publicly at the discretion of the administration.
---
DON'T BREAK THE LAW!
---
Other than that you can do / say whatever you want on this forum.
We reserve the right to block access to this website by any individual or organization at any time for any reason whatsoever or no reason at all.