http://twitchy.com/dougp/2023/09/11/ny-times-spotted-making-a-slight-modification-to-no-evidence-of-biden-corruption-n2387087
The Biden White House spin about the president's involvement with his son Hunter's overseas business dealings has gone from "never discussed" anything to "wasn't in business with" to "yes they talked but only about the weather."
The media's also doing their best to help out. Here's one example: The New York Times has many, many stories where they reported that there's "no evidence" of any Biden wrongdoing:
Now it looks like the Times has modified "no evidence" to add a word:
Clay Travis (@ClayTravis) ~ So after years of @nytimes claiming there was “no evidence” Joe Biden was ever involved in Hunter’s illegal activities, yesterday’s front page Hunter-Joe NYT story now says there is no “hard evidence” Joe Biden was involved. This is a totally made up term.
And everybody knows what the Times means by "no hard evidence":
alexandriabrown (@alexthechick) ~ There is no check made out to Joe Biden that says BRIBE in the memo line so there is no hard evidence.
Until the check made out to Joe Biden with "for bribes" written in the memo section combined with video recordings of the exchange the media will stick to "no hard evidence."
Well, Democrats are not very bright ... they can't think for themselves, so everything has to be presented to them in VERY simplistic terms or they won't understand anything.
"No hard evidence," but a whole lotta soft evidence.
The Times story also plays up the "just a loving father" angle, of course.
Fighting the Left 24/7 (@RiskyBizzzz) ~ They'll keep moving the goal post as necessary to defend the Biden crime family.
That's a certainty.
The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted. ~ D.H. Lawrence
| 
