« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: CLAIM: Pfizer and Moderna can now be sued for covid Vaccines.

By: micro in 6TH POPE | Recommend this post (0)
Sun, 22 Oct 23 2:21 PM | 31 view(s)
Boardmark this board | 6th Edition Pope Board
Msg. 46889 of 60008
(This msg. is a reply to 46888 by Decomposed)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Let the lawsuits begin!

Just proves that all were involved in a cover up and many people lost family members from complications to this poison...

Sue the living crap out of them...


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
CLAIM: Pfizer and Moderna can now be sued for covid Vaccines.
By: Decomposed
in 6TH POPE
Sun, 22 Oct 23 12:15 PM
Msg. 46888 of 60008

October 21, 2023

by Steve Kirsch
ThreadReaderApp.com


Breaking: You can now sue the mRNA COVID vaccine manufacturers for damages and the FDA is required to take the COVID vaccines off the market. Why? Adulteration. The plasmid bioactive contaminant sequences were NOT pointed out to the regulatory authorities. It's considered adulteration. I just got off the phone with Professor Byram Bridle and Dr. Robert Malone on this.

Michigan remdesivir case is very important precedent here proving liability shield falls when there is undisclosed contamination of active ingredients.
I’m doing a video interview with Byram and with Kevin tomorrow on this topic.

The FDA is now at a crossroads. Either they admit that they knew about the plasma contamination, and failed to disclose that to the public and to the outside committees, or they can claim that they didn’t know about it in which case Pfizer is liable. But we have the Pfizer documents that were given to the FDA so we know what the FDA got. And I seriously doubt there’s any disclosure of SV40 contamination. That means we have an adulterated vaccine and the FDA has to remove it from the market until the adulteration is fixed. If the FDA doesn’t do that, they should face criminal prosecution for endangering the public, and not following the law.

Here's the Michigan story for those who asked showing when there is contamination, there is no immunity. It makes sense. Otherwise, they can add arsenic into the vaccines and not be liable.

http://wwmt.com/news/local/michigan-judge-denies-drug-manufacturers-immunity-in-case-of-contaminated-covid-19-medication

All the COVID production vials are contaminated AFAIK. From both Moderna and Pfizer.
I just message Dr. Naomi Wolf re: Pfizer docs. She wasn't aware of any mention of SV40 in the Pfizer docs they gave the FDA (but she will check further).

So Pfizer has a VERY BIG problem.
I just got off the phone with attorney Warner Mendenhall. He confirmed I wrote is accurate and the litigation floodgates are now open.

Here is a list of 90 lawyers that you can contact if you want to sue the vaccine manufacturers:

http://airtable.com/appGIUGnttjzscdJF/shrAqtpTOTkoOgrbx/tblfVuObLpclbtF0W

The SV40 promoter is found in all the vials and it was in the gene sequence that was provided to the regulators. There is no mistake. The problem was that neither drug company ever pointed it out to the regulators. It's an unapproved contaminant that doesn't meet the standards set. So the regulators are off the hook. But if the regulators don't take action, then they dig themselves into a very deep hole. The law requires the FDA to stop the vaccine.

Robert Malone @RWMaloneMD just messaged me: “Yes I think that this DNA adulteration issue could be the wedge we have been looking for. Use of a plasmid with SV40 sequences as the template for manufacturing the pseudo-mRNA is, at a minimum, reckless and I can see no logical justification”
• • •

http://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1715820838564593745.html


« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next