« FFT4 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Hillary Clinton: 'People who call for ceasefire do not understand Hamas'

By: zzstar in FFT4 | Recommend this post (0)
Wed, 01 Nov 23 3:05 PM | 22 view(s)
Boardmark this board | FFT4
Msg. 09713 of 13858
(This msg. is a reply to 09712 by clo2)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

No ceasefire but also no 2000 lb bombs. Fight like men. Go in and try and get what you want. If there are civilian casualties then, it would not be a war crime as it is now.

Of all people in the world, Jews should respect their own history and not use it as an excuse to kill innocents.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Hillary Clinton: 'People who call for ceasefire do not understand Hamas'
By: clo2
in FFT4
Wed, 01 Nov 23 2:45 PM
Msg. 09712 of 13858

Bill could feel our pain, Hillary not so much.

I still believe she would have been a good POTUS, hands down compared to Trump.

But, I agree, killing innocent people creates hatred, that creates terrorists.

Ja'han Jones response to Hillary.

I can think of hundreds of thousands of people in the Gaza Strip who aren’t members of Hamas and would surely welcome a cease-fire.

So my response to the claim that people who want a cease-fire don’t understand the militant group is that, with all due respect, Clinton doesn’t appear to understand people. Or the resentment they can foster.

Clinton’s underestimation of the fervor of her opponent’s supporters has cost her politically in the past. And I think her remarks here extend from the same flaw: a poor ability to anticipate emotional reactions.

I’ll admit, I’ve grown tired of trying to appeal to people’s sensitivity during times of intense violence. As a millennial who came of age during the Black Lives Matter movement, I’ve been burned too much by complicit people who don’t seem moved by human suffering. These days, I find more success trying to appeal to people’s sanity and their longing for self-preservation, which both tend to be a bit more motivating.

So I’ll forgo the seemingly obvious point: that bombing innocent people is extremely cruel, even when it’s in response to cruel terrorist attacks.

And I’ll opt instead for a slightly less obvious point: that bombing innocent people is extremely ill-advised from a tactical perspective if the ultimate goal is eradicating terrorism. (I recently wrote about why it can be counterproductive here.)

Clinton certainly isn’t alone in her thinking; the Biden White House also opposes a cease-fire. But her viral remarks struck me as the kind of American hubris that many people around the globe — and, in fact, in the U.S. — have come to reject.

When U.S. elites are co-headlining events with infamous Vietnam War architect Henry Kissinger and telling us why bombing must continue in the Middle East, it seems like a sign they’re getting too comfortable with wartime casualties. Like a boomerang, sending cruelty out into the world can come right back.

http://www.msnbc.com/the-reidout/reidout-blog/hillary-clinton-ceasefire-israel-hamas-war-rcna122871?


« FFT4 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next