I ’ll admit it, and regular readers of this column have already seen dribs and drabs of this, but I simply can’t stand Nikki Haley. She represents so many awful and insufficient things about the pre-Trump Republican Party that they might not fit in a single entry in this space.
So I won’t even try. I’ll forego the discussion of Haley’s idiotic and cowardly participation in the Taliban-at-Bamiyan bowdlerization of South Carolina’s historical landmarks following the Dylann Roof mass murders at a black church. I’ll leave off talking about her non-stop neocon warmongering. I’ll leave her post–Jan. 6 disavowals of Donald Trump alone.
Instead, I’ll restrict this conversation to two items Haley inflicted on the American public on Tuesday, either of which, in its own right, would be disqualifying and, in tandem, should make her a pariah among conservatives.
I’ll call them the Toxic Femininity Moment and the Abominable Karenism Moment.
We’ll start with the Toxic Femininity Moment, which was a continuation of Haley’s shrill attacks on Vivek Ramaswamy. Haley said this:
What Ramaswamy said in that Republican presidential “kids’ table” debate about the horrifically underperforming Ronna McDaniel had absolutely nothing to do with her sex. His criticisms gave McDaniel a whole lot more respect as a professional than did Haley’s defense of her. Ramaswamy demanded McDaniel’s resignation because the results of the 2023 election cycle in Ohio, Kentucky, and Virginia, in particular, were the continuation of a string of GOP defeats for which she’s responsible.
And what Ramaswamy said about NBC debate moderator Kristen Welker — who shamelessly and irresponsibly pushed the Trump–Russia hoax on MSNBC audiences for two years until there was no more blood in that turnip — had nothing to do with Welker’s sex, and Ramaswamy similarly showed more respect for Welker as a professional than did Haley in her defense. Ramaswamy directed his criticisms of Welker at her job performance and said she wasn’t qualified to moderate a Republican presidential debate given the Democrat partisanship she’s shown throughout her career. That had nothing to do with the fact that Welker is female.
Then Ramaswamy “hit” Haley.
Let’s remember that what torqued Haley up at that debate more than anything else was that, when she attacked Ramaswamy for using the Chinese spy app disguised as a social media platform, or TikTok, for campaign messaging and outreach, Ramaswamy noted that, regardless of the manifest demerits of TikTok (which, bizarrely enough, was a corporate sponsor of the debate), it nonetheless delivers a large audience of young voters. And he punctuated that assertion by noting that Haley’s 25-year-old daughter had maintained a significant presence on TikTok.
This was completely valid argumentation. It wasn’t an attack on Haley’s family. It was a refutation of Haley that made her look ridiculous, to be sure, but it’s hard to argue that it isn’t fair game. After all, here is Haley screeching about how Ramaswamy shouldn’t be on an app that her own daughter doesn’t see a problem with.
What was her reaction when Ramaswamy mentioned her daughter’s use of TikTok? She called him “scum.” Then, later, she demanded that pro-life people be less “judgmental.” Lest they call abortionists “scum,” or something, one imagines.
Sure, the GOP is looking for charismatic and substantial female politicians to diversify its roster of candidates for high office (and, luckily enough, it’s finding them in people like Kristi Noem, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, Kim Reynolds, and Marsha Blackburn, among others). But we shouldn’t be willing to excuse this kind of low-level argumentation, which, as Benny Johnson noted above, apparently elevates women to the status of super-citizens who can’t be criticized for their actions without it being evidence of either sexism or male fragility.
Pathetic.
How many electoral failures does Ronna McDaniel — who reportedly called Ramaswamy an “asshole” rather than “scum” when he delivered his thunderbolts from the debate stage and vowed that the RNC wouldn’t support him with a single penny, something that would call into question her fitness to serve as its chair in the event he were to win the nomination — have to produce before Nikki Haley would permit a man to criticize her or seek her removal?
How many partisan Democrat lies can Welker tell before Haley would permit a man to question whether it’s appropriate to put up with her as a debate moderator? Does such a number exist, or is there no limit?
And are Ramaswamy’s disagreements with Haley, which have been the principal subject of memorable (and forgettable, to be sure) moments in the Republican debates, to be solely credited as “Battle of the Sexes” identity politics playing out?
That seems a hard thing to sell.
Ramaswamy has attacked Haley for being on corporate boards of defense contractors while demanding more military spending. Does that have anything to do with the sex of either? He’s also attacked her on Ukraine, which has nothing to do with either’s sex, and on a host of other policy issues.
Now he has something else to attack her on.: Haley also offered us Abominable Karenism this week. This has to be the death of her presidential campaign:
Got that? A Republican presidential candidate just went on national TV and advocated for the mandatory doxxing of everyone in the country who wants to have a presence on social media.
And she justifies it on national security grounds.
This obviously makes a mockery of national security. It’s the Patriot Act on crystal meth. It’s a mentality that shows utter and open disdain for individual privacy and, worse, directly emulates all the worst abuses of the Chinese Communist Party where it comes to cyberspace.
Ron DeSantis has largely left Haley alone while Ramaswamy has campaigned as her chief critic, but he broke his silence with a withering takedown of this insanity:
Nikki Haley has always been an irritating figure. When she decided to run for president, that character solidified. The value proposition of Nikki Haley is one of the most obnoxious in recent American political history — essentially, it’s that she offers George W. Bush/Mitt Romney politics, the brand that Americans have forcefully rejected sine 2004 and that now even the majority of Republican voters can’t stomach, but she offers it not as an old white guy from the country club but as someone of Indian heritage in heels.
This is slovenly enough, but Haley goes further — the second verse of this value proposition is that if you reject her brand of politics as you’ve rejected it from the Bushes, or Romney, or John Kasich, then your rejection is both racist and sexist.
Because of this, the meaner — and often anonymous — critics of Haley on Xwitter have taken to calling her “Brown Hillary.” Perhaps that stings enough to have generated the unhinged proposals she uncorked this week.
Stuck pigs squeal the loudest, of course. And the comparisons to Hillary Clinton are by no means off base.
We can do better than Nikki Haley. And if the Republican Party is again going to make itself relevant to the aspirations and concerns of the American people, we’re going to have to.
DON'T BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS WEBSITE!
The reader is responsible for discerning the validity, factuality or implications of information posted here, be it fictional or based on real events. Moderators on this forum make every effort to review the material posted on this site however, it is not realistically possible for a one man team to manually review each and every one of the posts atomicbobs.com gets on a daily basis.
The content of posts on this site, including but not limited to links to other web sites, are the expressed opinion of the original poster and are in no way representative of or endorsed by the owners or administration of this website. The posts on this website are the opinion of the specific author and are not statements of advice, opinion, or factual information on behalf of the owner or administration of Atomicbobs. This site may contain adult language, if you feel you might be offended by such content, you should log off immediately.
Not all posts on this website are intended as truthful or factual assertion by their authors. Some users of this website are participating in internet role playing, with or without the use of an avatar. NO post on this website should be considered factual information on face value alone. Users are encouraged to
USE DISCERNMENT
and do their own follow up research while reading and posting on this website. Atomicbobs.com reserves the right to make changes to, corrections and/or remove entirely at any time posts made on this website without notice. In addition, Atomicbobs.com disclaims any and all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of a post on this website.
This website implements certain security features in order to prevent spam and posting abuse. By making a post on this website you consent to any automated security checks required by our system to authenticate your IP address as belonging to an actual human. It is forbidden to make posts on this website from open proxy servers. By making a post on this website you consent to an automated one time limited port scan of your IP address which is required by our security system to validate the authenticity of your internet connection.
This site is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. You should not assume that this site is error-free or that it will be suitable for the particular purpose which you have in mind when using it. In no event shall Atomicbobs.com be liable for any special, incidental, indirect or consequential damages of any kind, or any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
Some events depicted in certain posting and threads on this website may be fictitious and any similarity to any person living or dead is merely coincidental. Some other articles may be based on actual events but which in certain cases incidents, characters and timelines have been changed for dramatic purposes. Certain characters may be composites, or entirely fictitious.
We do not discriminate against the mentally ill!
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to civil rights, economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science & technology, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
At some point freedom of speech and copyright law merge. The following interpretation of "Fair Use" and subsequent posting policy were developed with the assistance of qualified legal council however, we are not lawyers and cannot offer you legal advise as to the limits of "Fair Use"
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
Though legally each situation is evaluated independently according to guidelines that were intentionally left open to interpretation, we believe generally this policy represents "Fair Use" of any such copyrighted material for the purposes of education and discussion.
You are responsible for what you "publish" on the internet. You must be sure any copyrighted material you choose to post for discussion on this forum falls within the limits of "Fair Use" as defined by the law.
If you are a legal copyright holder or a designated agent for such and you believe a post on this website falls outside the boundaries of "Fair Use" and legitimately infringes on yours or your clients copyright
we may be contacted concerning copyright matters at:
If you require a courier address please send a fax or email and we will provide you with the required information.
For expedited human review & removal of potential copyright violations we encourage users & copyright holders to utilize the "Report Copyright Violation" button that accompanies each post published on this website.
In accordance with section 512 of the U.S. Copyright Act our contact information has been registered with the United States Copyright Office. "Safe Harbor" noticing procedures as outlined in the DMCA apply to this website concerning all 3rd party posts published herein.
If notice is given of an alleged copyright violation we will act expeditiously to remove or disable access to the material(s) in question. It is our strict policy to disable access to accounts of repeat copyright violators. We will also ban the IP address of repeat offenders from future posting on this website with or without a registered account.
All 3rd party material posted on this website is copyright the respective owners / authors. Atomicbobs.com makes no claim of copyright on such material.
Please be aware any communications sent complaining about a post on this website may be posted publicly at the discretion of the administration.
---
DON'T BREAK THE LAW!
---
Other than that you can do / say whatever you want on this forum.
We reserve the right to block access to this website by any individual or organization at any time for any reason whatsoever or no reason at all.