« FFT4 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Appeals Court Delivers Gut Punch to Voting Rights Act Enforcement

By: clo2 in FFT4 | Recommend this post (0)
Tue, 21 Nov 23 1:59 PM | 37 view(s)
Boardmark this board | FFT4
Msg. 09924 of 13932
(This msg. is a reply to 09920 by clo2)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Why this matters

The ruling found that only the U.S. attorney general can enforce Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which requires political maps to include districts where minority populations’ preferred candidates can win elections.

Election law experts say most challenges seeking to enforce Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act are brought by private groups and that the Justice Department has limited resources to pursue such cases. This ruling applies only to federal courts covered by the 8th Circuit.

The decision contradicts decades of precedent and could further erode protections under the landmark 1965 law. It’s likely the case eventually will make it to the U.S. Supreme Court, where the issue was raised in a 2021 opinion by Justice Neil Gorsuch.

apnews.com


Do something positive.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Appeals Court Delivers Gut Punch to Voting Rights Act Enforcement
By: clo2
in FFT4
Tue, 21 Nov 23 12:41 AM
Msg. 09920 of 13932

Appeals Court Delivers Gut Punch to Voting Rights Act Enforcement

In a destructive decision against the Voting Rights Act, a federal appeals court ruled on Monday that only the federal government can file lawsuits under the law, excluding private individuals and civil rights organizations. These groups have used the 1965 law for decades to argue that practices like the redrawing of electoral maps and voter ID requirements limit the voices of people of color. In February 2022, a Donald Trump-appointed judge decided that only the U.S. attorney general would have the power to sue, blocking civil rights groups representing Black voters from contesting an Arkansas redistricting case. According to Politico, the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals said on Monday that the expectation for “private right of action” for Section 2 of the law, which bans voting policies that racially discriminate, “rests on flimsy footing.” NPR reported that the court ruled 2-1, with Chief Circuit Judge Lavenski Smith, a Bush appointee, dissenting, saying, “Rights so foundational to self-government and citizenship should not depend solely on the discretion or availability of the government’s agents for protection.” The case may be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which ruled in favor of the Voting Rights Act in a similar Alabama case earlier this year.

Read it at Politico
http://www.thedailybeast.com/appeals-court-delivers-gut-punch-to-voting-rights-act-enforcement?


« FFT4 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next