Msg. 47574 of 60008 (This msg. is a reply to
47572 by
Decomposed)
Jump:
Methinks that the "normal" folks of the general public have seen enough of Disney and its woke pandering to not trust them as far as they can see them..
I personally hope they go belly up unless Iger is gotten rid of totally and replaced with someone who knows personally about normal family life and children just wanting to be children with imaginations of their favorite cartoon characters. NOT being introduced to drag queens and the woketard movement of serious mentally challenged immoral people trying to recruit innocent kids into their sick pathetic universe.
In what is becoming a sterling example of studio problematics, Disney is looking at a historically poor performance from its once-reliable component. Its Marvel division has long been a reliable cash-making entity, but in recent years that property has become a challenge. The once dependable movies have become hit-and-miss, and the superhero offerings on its streaming have been more miss. Now the company is looking at a villainous performance in theaters.
Last week saw the release of “The Marvels”, and the Brie Larson-led film was a resounding failure. The months preceding the premiere saw revised prospects for the film, as initial expectations of earning $100 million or so on its opening weekend began to be scaled back. Predictions became around $80 million based on diminished social media interest, then the week before release saw further tracking changes as the presales were showing a lack of passion from moviegoers.
Last weekend delivered a blunt reality, as the movie fell short of even those new predictions, as it debuted with $47 million, a record low for a Marvel movie. Excuses were made, chalking up the performance to “superhero fatigue”, or resorting to the studio’s regular practice of bam the audience; toxic masculinity was accused of leading to the failure of the female-driven film, a claim undone by reality. Audience data showed that two-thirds of the ticket buyers were male.
This second weekend delivered more dismal news. “The Marvels” barely managed to earn $10 million, making for a severe -79% drop from its premiere. This makes for the worst second-weekend performance of any comic book film, surpassing the reviled Marvel release “Morbius”. This is primed to be one of Disney’s largest money losers. Sporting a budget estimated in the $270 range, after factoring in marketing costs (as well as tax subsidies), it is estimated the film needs a final box office haul of $450-500 million to break even. It is on pace to fall well short of that goal.
The studio needed the exact opposite to take place. The self-created problems at the Disney Company have become legion, and they appear to be mounting. There has been speculation for some time that the internal upheaval at the House of Mouse could lead to a hostile takeover, and as problems only continue to spiral for the studio that is becoming more of a likelihood. Nelson Peltz, who heads the investment firm Trian Fund Management, and has been developing a growing presence on Disney’s board.
This is becoming a reality as the stock has recently hit a yearly low, a result of failures being realized across several spectrums. Motion picture releases – “Lightyear”, “Strange World”, “Indiana Jones 5”, and the recent “The Creator” -= have been seeing consistent losses. The theme parks have seen diminished crowds, television has long been struggling (made worse by writers and actors strikers) and the less said about streaming, the better. Disney+ has been losing subscribers and billions of dollars annually.
The studio chose to enter into a political dispute in Florida with Governor Ron DeSantis, another move leading to negative impacts. Battles over operations in the Orlando area have developed as a result, as have the reactions from the general public. By electing to contest the parental rights in education legislation the company took a very public stance that runs contrary to family standards, the very foundation of Disney’s generations of success catering to the audience for family entertainment. Polls showed strong support for the Florida law, and polling showed the company lost favorability with the general public.
All of this could be placed as the responsibility of CEO Bob Iger. Ironically this was due to his maneuvering done while he was not in charge. Years back Iger stepped away and placed his choice as a successor, Bob Chapek. When the Florida issue first emerged Chapek was content to take a neutral stance on the issue. This was a wise move, as roiling political emotions in your audience is rarely a fruitful endeavor. However Iger was giving interviews suggesting the company should take action, and he also moved to motivate faithful executives who remained with the company.
Eventually, internal pressure led to Chapek making public statements just days later opposing the Florida law, and from there, Disney’s fortunes spiraled downward. The ensuing problems led to Chapek’s ouster and Iger's return to the helm of the company one year ago. Instead of righting the foundering ship, Iger has seemed to perpetuate the same approach he fostered from afar. The results have been the type that begins to prove the need for a new direction. Perhaps a hostile takeover by Peltzer is more than encouraged – it may be what is needed.
DON'T BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS WEBSITE!
The reader is responsible for discerning the validity, factuality or implications of information posted here, be it fictional or based on real events. Moderators on this forum make every effort to review the material posted on this site however, it is not realistically possible for a one man team to manually review each and every one of the posts atomicbobs.com gets on a daily basis.
The content of posts on this site, including but not limited to links to other web sites, are the expressed opinion of the original poster and are in no way representative of or endorsed by the owners or administration of this website. The posts on this website are the opinion of the specific author and are not statements of advice, opinion, or factual information on behalf of the owner or administration of Atomicbobs. This site may contain adult language, if you feel you might be offended by such content, you should log off immediately.
Not all posts on this website are intended as truthful or factual assertion by their authors. Some users of this website are participating in internet role playing, with or without the use of an avatar. NO post on this website should be considered factual information on face value alone. Users are encouraged to
USE DISCERNMENT
and do their own follow up research while reading and posting on this website. Atomicbobs.com reserves the right to make changes to, corrections and/or remove entirely at any time posts made on this website without notice. In addition, Atomicbobs.com disclaims any and all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of a post on this website.
This website implements certain security features in order to prevent spam and posting abuse. By making a post on this website you consent to any automated security checks required by our system to authenticate your IP address as belonging to an actual human. It is forbidden to make posts on this website from open proxy servers. By making a post on this website you consent to an automated one time limited port scan of your IP address which is required by our security system to validate the authenticity of your internet connection.
This site is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. You should not assume that this site is error-free or that it will be suitable for the particular purpose which you have in mind when using it. In no event shall Atomicbobs.com be liable for any special, incidental, indirect or consequential damages of any kind, or any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
Some events depicted in certain posting and threads on this website may be fictitious and any similarity to any person living or dead is merely coincidental. Some other articles may be based on actual events but which in certain cases incidents, characters and timelines have been changed for dramatic purposes. Certain characters may be composites, or entirely fictitious.
We do not discriminate against the mentally ill!
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to civil rights, economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science & technology, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
At some point freedom of speech and copyright law merge. The following interpretation of "Fair Use" and subsequent posting policy were developed with the assistance of qualified legal council however, we are not lawyers and cannot offer you legal advise as to the limits of "Fair Use"
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
Though legally each situation is evaluated independently according to guidelines that were intentionally left open to interpretation, we believe generally this policy represents "Fair Use" of any such copyrighted material for the purposes of education and discussion.
You are responsible for what you "publish" on the internet. You must be sure any copyrighted material you choose to post for discussion on this forum falls within the limits of "Fair Use" as defined by the law.
If you are a legal copyright holder or a designated agent for such and you believe a post on this website falls outside the boundaries of "Fair Use" and legitimately infringes on yours or your clients copyright
we may be contacted concerning copyright matters at:
If you require a courier address please send a fax or email and we will provide you with the required information.
For expedited human review & removal of potential copyright violations we encourage users & copyright holders to utilize the "Report Copyright Violation" button that accompanies each post published on this website.
In accordance with section 512 of the U.S. Copyright Act our contact information has been registered with the United States Copyright Office. "Safe Harbor" noticing procedures as outlined in the DMCA apply to this website concerning all 3rd party posts published herein.
If notice is given of an alleged copyright violation we will act expeditiously to remove or disable access to the material(s) in question. It is our strict policy to disable access to accounts of repeat copyright violators. We will also ban the IP address of repeat offenders from future posting on this website with or without a registered account.
All 3rd party material posted on this website is copyright the respective owners / authors. Atomicbobs.com makes no claim of copyright on such material.
Please be aware any communications sent complaining about a post on this website may be posted publicly at the discretion of the administration.
---
DON'T BREAK THE LAW!
---
Other than that you can do / say whatever you want on this forum.
We reserve the right to block access to this website by any individual or organization at any time for any reason whatsoever or no reason at all.