http://twitchy.com/grateful-calvin/2023/12/06/kristen-clarke-house-testimony-missouri-v-biden-n2390517
The Biden administration has a long track record of putting completely incompetent people in high-profile positions. His list of judicial nominees includes a SCOTUS justice who cannot define a woman as well as another judge who doesn't know the difference between an injunction and a restraining order. Of course, we all remember Sam Brinton, who likes to dress in women's clothes and steal luggage, but somehow was in charge of nuclear waste. Karine Jean-Pierre, when she's not writing Biden's tweets for him, likes to display her incompetence daily in the White House Briefing Room. As for Vice President Kamala Harris ... well, that one pretty much speaks for itself.
ROTFLMAO! Yep, Kamala ala Bimbo is famous for polishing Willie Brown's knob AND for serving up big ol' bowls of incomprehensible Word Salad. But, that's what you get in the Biden administration - incompetent, ignorant boobs - because Biden hires based on skin color, whether they have a vagina (or at least, THINK they should have a vagina) between their legs, and whether they engage in perverted sexual acts. Demonstrating qualified competence does not appear to enter into the hiring equation in the Biden administration.
More incompetence in the Biden administration was proudly on parade on Dec. 5 when Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division Kristen Clarke testified before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Oversight of the DOJ Civil Rights Division. She faced many challenging questions, particularly about the DOJ targeting pro-life activists.
Okay, point of order, here ... Kristen Clarke is the ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, appointed by Joe Biden, IN CHARGE OF the DOJ's Civil Rights Division. She IS the top dog of the Civil Rights Division in the U.S. Department of Justice. Let THAT sink in for just a moment before we continue.
Relatively speaking, Republican Rep. Dan Bishop asking her a few questions about the ongoing First Amendment case, Missouri v. Biden, should have been a walk in the park. But remember, these are Biden appointees we are talking about. Watch:
House Judiciary GOP (@JudiciaryGOP) ~ Let us get this straight ...
DOJ’s U.S. Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division Kristen Clarke IS NOT familiar with Missouri v Biden, one of the most massive attacks on free speech in American history and the largest Supreme Court case this year.
WOW.
Video ~ http://twitter.com/i/status/1732071935029268597
Uh, Ms. Clarke ...
Missouri v. Biden is currently in the hands of the Supreme Court of the United States. And Clarke, by her testimony here, isn't even familiar with it. A free speech case is being taken up by SCOTUS and the Assistant AG for Civil Rights can't answer any questions.
We wish we were joking here.
Our favorite part of the clip is towards the end where Clarke, in so many words, asks Rep. Bishop if he could give her the Cliff's Notes version of the case. LOL. It's not junior high school anymore, ma'am.
TrashDiscourse (@ThaWoodChipper) ~ I have no words ...
We understand that. But she didn't have any either and that's far worse.
Tom Fitton (@TomFitton) ~ The Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department is thoroughly radicalized and partisan.
Umm, we're pretty sure you can say that about the entire Justice Department under Biden and Merrick Garland.
The Injustice Department of Biden's Banana Republic.
Shashi (@shashigalore) ~ This is the gross incompetence you can expect when you hire for DEI quotas instead of actual ability and intellect. Now imagine this in every level of society ... engineering, computing, medicine, teaching, etc. We are destroying ourselves through DEI and it needs to end.
But, but, but, but ... she's BLACK ... and notwithstanding Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's personal inability to discern what a woman IS, Ms. Clarke also appears to be a WOMAN. So Democrat logic informs us that, as a black woman, Ms. Clarke doesn't possess the intellectual wherewithal to be held to normal standards of competent knowledge ... right, Randi Weingarten?! You Democrats had to dumb down the tests for Ms. Clarke, so she would at least APPEAR to be a qualified hire.
Jim Hanson (@JimHansonDC) ~ She may have been hired for something other than her deep knowledge of important US jurisprudence on the most important civil liberty.
Uh oh ... you mean Ms. Clarke might have risen to her greatest level of incompetence in the DOJ by emulating Kamala ala Bimbo? Hmmm ... Willie Brown must be proud ... and aroused.
Gee, ya think?
Of course, some people didn't think Clarke was being exactly honest in professing her ignorance.
StopWokeCulture (@MkayUokay) ~ Kristen Clarke is a liar.
This is likely the case (at least partially), but still. The brazenness of just declaring openly that you are not familiar with what lower courts deemed to be potentially 'one of the most massive attacks on free speech in American history' just screams that basic competence and knowledge are not job qualifications in the Biden administration.
FugitiveMama (@fugitivemama) ~ Let’s play! Is she incompetent or corrupt?
You know what this writer is going to say in response to that question:
Embrace the power of "AND."
| 