Judge criticizes Trump’s expert witness as he again refuses to toss fraud lawsuit
In the three-page ruling, Engoron wrote that the “most glaring” flaw of Trump’s argument was to assume that the testimony provided by Eli Bartov, an accounting professor at New York University, and other expert witnesses would be accepted by the court as “true and accurate.”
“Bartov is a tenured professor, but the only thing his testimony proves is that for a million or so dollars, some experts will say whatever you want them to say,” Engoron wrote.
Bartov, who was paid nearly $900,000 for his work on the trial, said in an email that the judge had mischaracterized his testimony.
http://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-fraud-trial-engoron-nyu-expert-3e425326b9954162d51edec2013515c6?
Do something positive.