http://twitchy.com/justmindy/2023/12/31/jamie-raskin-supreme-court-recuse-clarence-thomas-n2391268
One thing is for certain, it is so refreshing when Leftists are honest about their actual intentions. Today, Democratic Representative Jamie Raskin did just that on CNN.
Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) ~ The ball game folks: Dems want to destroy the Supreme Court.
Dem Rep. Jamie Raskin says Justice Clarence Thomas "absolutely should recuse himself" from decisions on Trump's ballot access, saying "the question is, what do we do if he doesn't?"
http://twitter.com/i/status/1741483075266126187
Hmmm ... Jamie, are you inciting violence against a sitting Supreme Court justice???
Bonchie (@bonchieredstate) ~ There it is. As I said earlier in the week, this is what these ballot access cases are really about. None of these chopped-hair libs actually think they will succeed. Rather, this is about setting up the Supreme Court to rule against them so they can claim "threat to democracy!"
Sean Davis (@seanmdav) ~ Democrats are now doing assassination prep on specific Supreme Court judges.
At the minimum, they want to ruin the lives and reputations of the Justices, and make it so families cannot even eat out in peace.
John Hasson (@SonofHas) ~ Chuck Schumer put a target on Justice Kavanaugh’s back prior to the Dobbs ruling and then someone tried to assassinate Kavanaugh.
Now, Jamie Raskin is putting a target on Justice Thomas’s back ...
Benjamin Weingarten (@bhweingarten) ~ This was, is, and always has been the play: Launch a lawfare war knowing it will end up at SCOTUS, savage SCOTUS in a bid to force it to cave, or delegitimize/destroy it thereby creating a constitutional/potential nullification crisis.
http://thefederalist.com/2023/08/28/if-democrats-criminalize-opposition-and-cripple-the-court-democracy-is-dead/
If they can't destroy it, they will insist it needs to be expanded immediately so Joe Biden can add five or six judges. Since Joe Biden is a vegetable, the actual selection process will be managed by whomever is actually running the White House these days.
Tim Carney (@TPCarney) ~ At least Raskin is consistent in trying to stop people from voting for the guy he dislikes. He was a trailblazer last decade in trying to disqualify legal electors.
AH HA ... there, you see, is the rub. Poor lil' Jamie is just as guilty for what he is trying to project onto others.
Brother Seamus (@WaynePelota) ~ Speaking of promoting a Big Lie™️ and attacking democracy, here’s @RepRaskin trying to prevent certification of the 2016 election ... he should probably recuse himself from this entire conversation. The only question is “what do we do if he doesn’t?”
The Democrats would call Raskin a 'threat to democracy' if he was on the other side. Funny how he isn't a 'threat' when he is on their side.
Yep, lil' Jamie should absolutely recuse himself from this entire conversation since he is a dastardly "election denier." And, if he doesn't ... well ... "what do we do if he doesn't?"
| 
