#msg-1236898
Of course, you have plenty of company in your community of ignorance. Heck, even the so-called "Conservative" columnist at The Washington Post, Jennifer Rubin - who is an attorney AND a foaming-at-the-mouth libtard - pontificates that Texas Governor Abbott should be held in contempt for flouting the Supreme Court's recent decision. But, as per usual, you and Jennifer are asshats who don't have the first clue as to what you are bloviating about. Take a look and educate yourself, clo ...
Jennifer Rubin Wants the Feds to Get a Contempt Order Against Gov. Greg Abbott
http://twitchy.com/brettt/2024/01/30/jennifer-rubin-wants-the-feds-to-get-a-contempt-order-against-gov-greg-abbott-n2392357
Jennifer Rubin is one of the Washington Post's conservative columnists. We thought she was just Never Trump, but she voted for Joe Biden and seems to fully support his neglect of the border as more than 300,000 illegals crossed over in December alone, a new record.
As we recently reported, the Washington Post just published an analysis of elected Republicans ignoring orders from the Supreme Court. Maybe that's where she went wrong — reading her own newspaper. As has been explained a thousand times now, all SCOTUS did was rule 5-4 that the federal government could cut the razor wire barriers that Texas had put up along its borders. A federal judge ruled they could not; SCOTUS vacated that decision. That's it. There was no "order" for Texas to do anything.
Rubin says that Texas Gov. Greg Abbott is "flouting" the Supreme Court and the feds should secure a contempt order against him. How is he in contempt? What order is he flouting? SCOTUS never ruled on whether Texas could keep putting up barriers.
Jennifer Truthful, Not Neutral Rubin (@JRubinBlogger) ~ If Abbott continues to flout the Supreme Court, the feds should return to court to get a contempt order against him. If the executive branch and the courts do not put an end to states’ antebellum-like legal nullification, it will become the norm.
http://washingtonpost.cm/opinions/2024/01/29/judges-maga-lawlessness/
*********************************************************
Community Notes: Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Warning: there is a typo in the article URL that results in a redirect to a malware site.
Separately, Abbot has not flouted the SCOTUS order. The order vacated an injunction that had barred federal agents from removing the razor wire; it did not restrict further installation.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/supreme-court-sides-biden-administration-texas-border-dispute/story?id=106575343
*********************************************************
Community Notes for the win.
Kurt Schlichter (@KurtSchlichter) ~ I CAN'T BELIEVE YOU WERE AN LA LAWYER ONCE!
What order? What did any court order TX to do or not do? There isn't one, you half-wit! Your bad law thingy offends me!
Annie Webber (@ds_abp) ~ My door knob read the decision more accurately than Rubin.
John (@HntrCrkPiP) ~ I'm not a lawyer, however I've been paying attention and I'm pretty sure: 1) Texas hasn't defied SCOTUS, and 2) a liberal, even remotely complaining about ANYONE, ignoring SCOTUS is rich.
Michelle Ray (@GaltsGirl) ~ Except, Abbot isn't flouting the Supreme Court. You're embarrassing yourself.
You're embarrassing yourself, too, clo.
Me (@Keefer1958 ) ~ Q: What did SCOTUS order Texas to do?
A: NOTHING.
How can Texas be "flouting" SCOTUS when Texas wasn't ordered to do anything?
Joe Schueller (@schuellerj) ~ Would you like to share with the class what SCOTUS order you think Texas is defying?
Name cannot be blank (@realchrishynes) ~ You are weapons-grade ignorant, cat lady.
Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) ~ So Abbott is engaged in “nullification” by not agreeing to nullify federal immigration law as per Biden’s insistence? Makes sense!
Well ... it "makes sense" to bat-sh!t crazy cat ladies ... and to dementia patients like Joe Biden.
QTheLibertine (@QTheLibertine1) ~ For the love of God, why do you continue to comment on things you clearly never bothered to understand.
Epstein, Epstein! Read all about it! (@TasteSubjective) ~ It is bad enough that you inflict your questionable understanding of what "lifting an injunction" means, but please, proof-read your posts before dispensing malware-afflicted links to your followers.
The WaPo website is malware.
Stat Woman (@Stat_Woman) ~ So, flouting the Supreme Court is bad now?
http://www.dailywire.com/news/biden-ignores-supreme-court-cancels-another-74000-student-loans
SCOTUS lifted the injunction on January 22. It's now January 30 and people like Rubin still have no understanding of what exactly happened.
Because they are willfully ignorant boobs.
| 