Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: The Blind Watchmaker 

By: Zimbler0 in 6TH POPE | Recommend this post (1)
Sun, 18 Feb 24 1:44 AM | 28 view(s)
Boardmark this board | 6th Edition Pope Board 		Msg. 50301 of 60008
(This msg. is a reply to 50263 by De_Composed)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

>>>
Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe Without Design,
>>>


This, I have no problem believing and going along with. It's a dog-eat-dog world out there, and 'survival of the fittest' means it is not necessarily the 'best design' that wins out but the most adaptable to the various niches in the eco-systems.

Zim.




Avatar

Mad Poet Strikes Again.


 - - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
The Blind Watchmaker
By: De_Composed in 6TH POPE
Sat, 17 Feb 24 5:37 AM 		Msg. 50263 of 60008

Last month's book was 'The Emperor of All Maladies' - on the history of cancer and the fight against it. It took me a little over a month. Hey, I'm not a speed reader! Nor was it a novel. It's more like a college text, and getting through it in one month took a bit of work.

Today I finished 'The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe Without Design,' by Richard Dawkins. It took me a little LESS than a month to get through its 318 pages, but the concepts were even harder than Emperor's. It had some interesting points, but I wouldn't recommend it. To be honest, I found most of it dull. Dawkins is loquacious, and his writing style seems to be 'stream of consciousness,' even if it's not. He constantly goes off on tangents, and I found it hard to stay with him - especially when he references something like Lamarckism that he may have last touched upon 100 pages earlier.

But wow, is the guy ever smart. There's no doubt of that. The Economist called this book "as readable and vigorous a defense of Darwinism as has been published since 1859" - and I don't think that's an exaggeration.

My other criticism of the book is that while it purports to be about the evidence against "design," most of the book was on other things - such as attacks on each and every other well known theory for how we came to be. His attacks are sound, but they're largely off topic IMO. I'm glad I read it, but I think its 318 pages could have been whittled down to perhaps 31 with no real loss to what the average reader will take away from it.

The book was my buddy's pick. He'd read it several times before. So, next, I'm picking one of MY favorite novels: Atlas Shrugged. I've read it twice. If you guys haven't read it, you should. (I'd be very surprised if CTJ hasn't.)

« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next