« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Gabriel, Blow the Trumpets: New Scientist Offers 'More Subtle View' on ... Cannibalism 

By: Beldin in 6TH POPE | Recommend this post (1)
Wed, 21 Feb 24 6:41 PM | 29 view(s)
Boardmark this board | 6th Edition Pope Board
Msg. 50480 of 60008
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

http://twitchy.com/grateful-calvin/2024/02/21/new-scientist-calls-for-a-subtle-view-on-cannibalism-n2393134

The self-immolation of the scientific community is pretty remarkable to see. In recent years, we have seen once-respected scientific institutions destroy their credibility and any trust people once had in their expertise. From embracing COVID narratives that all turned out to be false, to adopting the bogus biological claims of the gender ideology cult, to even scolding us not to put ice in our cocktails because of the 'climate crisis,' they have turned the very words 'scientist' and 'expert' into a bad joke.

But at least they weren't telling us all to feast on each other's flesh ... well, until now, that is.

The tweet below links to an actual article, not Swiftian satire, published by New Scientist magazine (whose motto, ironically, is 'The best place to find out what's new in science -- and why it matters').

What's 'new' for New Scientist, apparently, is cannibalism.

New Scientist (@newscientist) ~ Is it time for a more subtle view on the ultimate taboo: cannibalism?
Uploaded Image
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg26134783-600-is-it-time-for-a-more-subtle-view-on-the-ultimate-taboo-cannibalism/#Echobox=1708344526

Uploaded Image

"Cannibalism ... sometimes for compassionate reasons???!!! 

Uploaded Image

Our reaction exactly. Except actually, this isn't even a 'new' idea from New Scientist. Cannibalism is something that is trotted out once in a while by the leftist media, we imagine as some kind of sick, twisted test balloon to see how people react. A couple of years ago -- this is not a joke -- The New York Times wrote that it might be the time to bring back cannibalism because of climate change.

But since the concept didn't fly in 2022, New Scientist decided to fly the cannibalism flag again. This time, they're saying that the only reason we reject cannibalism is ... wait for it ... because we're racists and colonizers.

You honestly can't make this nonsense up.

Andrew Young - TANSTAAFL King Curmudgeon (@NucMM1retired) ~ This is how they convince us to eat bugs.

'Oh, you don't want to eat people? OK. Try this cockroach burger instead. Isn't that better?'

Assault Clip, #2A Voter (@assaultclip) ~ Eat the bugs, eat the soy, eat the lab meat, or eat the neighbor?

Always remember that WE are the carbon that they want to reduce.

GenX Politics (@GenXPolitico1) ~ Critical Soylent Theory has arrived.

Marc Cocteaustan (@Igor_Cocteau) ~ Soon ...
Uploaded Image

Don't laugh (OK, we laughed). But if they can trot out queer theory, race theory, and gender theory, 'eating people theory' can't be far behind.

Murican (@Muricanguyyeah) ~ When the food shortages hit don't eat the leftists. They're infected with spike proteins.

HA. OK, now THAT one we can laugh at and feel good about it.

GoFundYourself (@TimetoReset1) ~ This is about 2 conversations away from Its okay to eat people as long as they’re those evil whites.

brian haggard (@BhhagBrian) ~ How soon before the leftist media claims White people are tasty and low in cholesterol?

Given that the article claims we only object to cannibalism because of racist colonialism, this is probably the next logical step for them.

What about green people? ribit ... you don't need yer legs, do ya??? 




Avatar

The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted. ~ D.H. Lawrence




» You can also:
« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next