http://twitchy.com/brettt/2024/06/08/hamas-sympathizers-upset-200-palestinians-killed-to-rescue-four-hostages-n2397098
Right after October 7, people were demanding that Israel institute a "proportional response." In other words, remember that ONLY 1,200 Israeli civilians were slaughtered and more than 200 were taken hostage in a surprise terrorist attack. Sure, Israel has a right to retaliate, but the response has to be proportional. What did that mean? Kill 1,200 Palestinian civilians and call it even?
No, Israel has embarked on a much more righteous response - go after and kill the murderers, rapists, and kidnappers of Hamas who perpetrated this heinous, unprovoked sneak attack against Israeli civilians. The IDF does its absolute best to limit civilian casualties in the process, but Hamas insists on cowering behind its own civilian population as human shields. Hamas has no regard for human life; the Israelis do - which is why the Israelis are civilized and Hamas terrorists are not. This is an exceedingly easy choice for civilized, rational people to make.
A lot of people are mad that 80 ... no, wait, 150 ... no, wait, more than 200 Palestinians were killed in an operation to rescue just four hostages? How does that ratio work out?
Rohan Talbot (@rohantalbot) ~ Dozens and dozens killed - including many children - to save four. Somebody please explain to me the acceptable ratio of human life.
Wow, Rohan ... you truly are a disingenuous retard. Your boys started a war. War is not about "acceptable ratios" ... it is about fighting the war until one side can no longer continue. Peace happens when one side kicks the ever livin' snot out of the other side. Here is something your boys should have considered before launching their sneak attack ...
Amr Waked (@amrwaked) ~ Israel killed more than estimated so far 150 Palestinian civilians in an operation to release 4 prisoners of war. The prisoners were all alive and in good health. Hamas did not kill any of the 4 POWs. You CANNOT ignore this!
Ah, Amr ... you were not holding "prisoners of war" who were combatants, you retarded piece of sh!t ... you were holding kidnapped civilians against their will. So, the fact that some of them are still in good health makes you a "good guy"? Many of the hostages you took are already dead ... not to mention the babies you butchered on Israeli soil. No, asshole ... you don't get brownie points for this.
لينة (@LinahAlsaafin) ~ Every news outlet that reported this as a rescue mission has blood on its hands. 210 Palestinians were massacred and 400 others wounded. This was not a rescue operation, this is a mass slaughter.
While I strongly suspect your numbers are inflated, 210 Palestinian terrorists and their supporters dead (plus 400 wounded) in exchange for 4 released hostages sounds ...
BUT, you do realize that there could have been zero Palestinian casualties IF you had simply turned over the hostages unharmed to the IDF in the first place? Right? You DO realize this undeniable FACT, right, dumbass?!
Holden (@Holden114) ~ Assuming this is true, the follow up question is why were there women and children at a location where hostages were being kept?
Ah, yes ... right back to square one where Hamas shows themselves to be cowardly pussies who don't give a damn about their own Palestinian civilians.
For what it's worth, CNN is saying that 210 were killed, according to Gazan officials. Rep. Chip Roy worked out the ratio:
Chip Roy (@chiproytx) ~ RATIO = (save any of my people): (unlimited # of your people necessary, actual civilians minimized as much as possible but only to extent objective of maximizing saving my people is achieved)
Bonchie (@bonchieredstate) ~ The same people who claimed 500-700 were killed in an Israeli bombing that was actually a PIJ rocket falling short that killed 25 people are not telling you the truth now about the death toll to rescue the hostages.
"The prisoners were all alive and in good health. Hamas did not kill any of the four prisoners of war." Yes, but you see, they were civilians, not prisoners of war, and "alive and in good health" means what after 246 days in captivity?
AmErican (@Flipper628 ) ~ Wow! It’s almost as if it would have been better if Hamas just released them!
Ella Travels (Ella Kenan) (@EllaTravelsLove) ~ So it was a bad idea to kidnap innocent civilians and hide them amongst civilians?
Christina Pushaw (@ChristinaPushaw) ~ If Hamas cared about any of these lives, they would have released the hostages. Or as you put it, "bla bla bla ..." {See below}
Hard Pass (@HardPass4) ~ Why were civilians guarding hostages?
Chica'sBailBonds (@IrinaMoises) ~ Lesson here is FREE THE HOSTAGES and don’t go on rape and murder sprees. It’s not hard.
Dr Brian of London (@brianoflondon) ~ How many more do you want us to kill to get the rest? Tell Hamas to surrender.
Dr. This Little Piggy BsD (@woodyspigroasts) ~ I'd say one Israeli hostage is worth 100,000 terrorist lives. I know, I know, it's a low number, but I'm certainly willing to go higher.
Rath (@mak3333) ~ Your mistake is thinking there is supposed to be an even ratio of casualties in a war.
By the way, ever wonder what Hamas had to gain by starting a war against a much stronger opponent thus sacrificing tens of thousands of their own people to a futile death?
What did Hamas think was going to happen after October 7? Surely the people who planned it had an exit strategy, right?
Oh, absolutely ... the Hamas leaders were either already living comfortably in Qatar or had plans to get themselves out of Gaza if things got too hot. In either case, the big pussies of Hamas had no problem leaving the little pussies of Hamas and the Palestinian civilians holding the bag and getting killed.
| 
