« FFT4 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: BREAKING: Supreme Court rules gun 'bump stocks' ban is unlawful 

By: weco in FFT4 | Recommend this post (2)
Sat, 15 Jun 24 9:46 AM | 18 view(s)
Boardmark this board | FFT4
Msg. 11909 of 13297
(This msg. is a reply to 11908 by oldCADuser)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Supremes should have turned away, left it alone... Until Congress is blue again, nothing will improve, no matter how many die, of any age.. They have no ethics, morals, conscience... Until that improves, we're all screwed...


- - Prosecute, Prosecute, Prosecute 'em ALL!




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: BREAKING: Supreme Court rules gun 'bump stocks' ban is unlawful
By: oldCADuser
in FFT4
Sat, 15 Jun 24 4:55 AM
Msg. 11908 of 13297

There's a fallacy here.

When you REPLACE the fixed-stock of a semi-automatic weapon with a bump-stock, this converts it into a fully-automatic machine gun. Now if someone were to REPLACE the original sear in an AR-15 with an auto-sear, it would convert it into something very similar to an M16, that is, a fully-automatic machine gun.

Now what's the difference if in one case you REPLACED the stock, and you can now fire in a full-auto mode? Or if you REPLACED the sear, and you can now fire in a full-auto mode? What's different here?

In the second case, the law is very clear, and it's been backed-up by the courts, replacing the sear violates federal law. But now the Court is telling us that replacing a different part of the same exact weapon, which results in the same exact outcome, that's legal.


« FFT4 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next