Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: IT BEGINS: Kansas Sues Pfizer

By: micro in 6TH POPE | Recommend this post (0)
Tue, 18 Jun 24 1:36 PM | 23 view(s)
Boardmark this board | 6th Edition Pope Board 		Msg. 54264 of 60008
(This msg. is a reply to 54263 by De_Composed)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

when is FAUCI going to be added to the defendants list for blatantly lying about uses his office to tell everybody that they should get the JAB ?

I would love nothing more than to see this overbearing gas bag dropped down a few rungs from his self made pedestal and smugness.

To me, this was noting more than a smoke screen to eradicate a lot of the elderly population under a guise.

They cost too much every month and with known eugenicist Billy Gates in favor he too should be put on the chopping block.

Billy boy should simply stick to the things he actually knows. He is not a genius. What he was in reality was a thief. And got away with it.

The truth is NONE of the people who actually were to blame for the deaths of so many will never have to be held accountable..
THAT is exactly why nobody should ever have any trust or confidence in anything the Gubmint says to ya...



- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
IT BEGINS: Kansas Sues Pfizer
By: De_Composed in 6TH POPE
Tue, 18 Jun 24 11:14 AM 		Msg. 54263 of 60008

June 17, 2024

IT BEGINS: Kansas Sues Pfizer — State Alleges Company Knew of ‘Serious Adverse Events’ Yet Marketed COVID-19 Vaccine as ‘Safe’

by Jim Hoft
TheGatewayPundit.com


Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach announced Monday he is suing pharmaceutical giant Pfizer for misleading Kansas residents about the safety and efficacy of its COVID-19 vaccine.

During a press conference in Topeka, alongside Deputy Attorney General Fran Oleen and Assistant Attorneys General Kaley Schrader and Melanie Jack, Kobach detailed the allegations lodged against Pfizer.

“Pfizer made multiple misleading statements to deceive the public about its vaccine at a time when Americans needed the truth,” said Kobach.

The complaint, lodged today in Thomas County District Court, accuses Pfizer of misleading Kansans about the vaccines’ risks, including potential harm to pregnant women and the risk of myocarditis. The suit further alleges that Pfizer falsely claimed its vaccine was effective against COVID variants, despite evidence to the contrary.

Pfizer is also accused of suggesting its vaccine prevented COVID-19 transmission despite admitting it had not studied whether its vaccine halted transmission.

The State of Kansas outlines several specific allegations in its lawsuit:

1. Pfizer misled the public that it had a “safe and effective” COVID-19 vaccine.
2. Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine was safe even though it knew its COVID-19 vaccine was connected to serious adverse events, including myocarditis and pericarditis, failed pregnancies, and deaths. Pfizer concealed this critical safety information from the public.
3. Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine was effective even though it knew its COVID19 vaccine waned over time and did not protect against COVID-19 variants. Pfizer concealed this critical effectiveness information from the public.
4. Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine would prevent transmission of COVID-19 even though it knew it never studied the effect of its vaccine on transmission of COVID-19.
5. To keep the public from learning the truth, Pfizer worked to censor speech on social media that questioned Pfizer’s claims about its COVID-19 vaccine.
6. Pfizer’s misrepresentations of a “safe and effective” vaccine resulted in record company revenue of approximately $75 billion from COVID-19 vaccine sales in just two years.
7. Pfizer’s actions and statements relating to its COVID-19 vaccine violated previous consent judgments with the State of Kansas.
8. Pfizer’s actions and statements relating to its COVID-19 vaccine violated the Kansas Consumer Protection Act, K.S.A. 50-623 et seq., regardless of whether any individual consumer ultimately received Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.
9. Pfizer must be held accountable for falsely representing the benefits of its COVID19 vaccine while concealing and suppressing the truth about its vaccine’s safety risks, waning effectiveness, and inability to prevent transmission.

The Gateway Pundit previously reported that in a case involving the Health Freedom Defense Fund and other plaintiffs versus the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD), the court acknowledged the plaintiffs’ claim that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines do not meet the traditional definition of vaccines because they do not prevent the spread of the virus but only mitigate symptoms.

In its decision, the 9th Circuit highlighted that the district court had misapplied the precedent set by Jacobson v. Massachusetts, which upheld mandatory smallpox vaccinations due to their effectiveness in preventing disease spread. The court noted that the plaintiffs’ claims, taken as true at this stage, suggest that the COVID-19 vaccines do not effectively “prevent the spread” of COVID-19, thereby warranting further consideration of their allegations.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/06/it-begins-kansas-sues-pfizer-state-alleges-company/

« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next