« FFT4 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Supreme Court rules for Jan. 6 rioter challenging obstruction charge

By: zzstar in FFT4 | Recommend this post (0)
Fri, 28 Jun 24 5:07 PM | 24 view(s)
Boardmark this board | FFT4
Msg. 12060 of 13976
(This msg. is a reply to 12059 by clo2)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

But the vote was not entirely along the usual ideological lines. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson agreed with the majority to limit the use of the obstruction law while Justice Amy Coney Barrett dissented.

http://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2024-06-28/supreme-court-rejects-obstruction-charges-for-hundreds-of-jan-6-rioters


What bullshit reporting without reporting who dissented and who voted for it.

The biggest problem in America is its generally stupid press.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Supreme Court rules for Jan. 6 rioter challenging obstruction charge
By: clo2
in FFT4
Fri, 28 Jun 24 4:54 PM
Msg. 12059 of 13976

Supreme Court rules for Jan. 6 rioter challenging obstruction charge
The closely-watched case focuses on charge that former President Donald Trump also faces in his election interference case.

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Friday ruled in favor of a former police officer who is seeking to throw out an obstruction charge for joining the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, 2021, in a ruling that could benefit former President Donald Trump.

The justices on a 6-3 vote handed a win to defendant Joseph Fischer, who is among hundreds of Jan. 6 defendants — including Trump — who have been charged with obstructing an official proceeding over the effort to prevent Congress' certification of President Joe Biden’s election victory.

The court concluded that the law, enacted in 2002 as part of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act after the Enron accounting scandal, was only intended to apply in limited circumstances involving tampering with physical evidence.

The court sent the case back to lower courts for further proceedings on whether the Justice Department could still prosecute Fischer under the new interpretation of the law.

The statute in question, 18 U.S. Code 1512, carries a prison sentence of up to 20 years.

To what extent the ruling favors Trump remains to be seen. Prosecutors in Trump’s case said that even if Fischer wins, Trump’s conduct would still be covered by a narrower interpretation of the statute.

Fischer faces seven criminal charges, only one of which was the focus of the Supreme Court case. Even if the obstruction charge is ultimately dismissed, the other charges, including assaulting a police officer and entering a restricted building, will remain in place.

The court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, has in the past been skeptical of prosecutors when they assert broad applications of criminal provisions.

In his election interference case, Trump faces four charges, including one count of obstructing an official proceeding and another of conspiracy to do so.

more:
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-rules-jan-6-rioter-challenging-obstruction-char-rcna155902


« FFT4 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next