« FFT4 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

It's a complicated ruling — attempting to draw a line between official and unofficial acts.

By: clo2 in FFT4 | Recommend this post (0)
Mon, 01 Jul 24 4:36 PM | 15 view(s)
Boardmark this board | FFT4
Msg. 12090 of 13302
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Roberts wrote the Trump immunity decision

Daniel Arkin

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority decision in the Trump immunity ruling.

It's a complicated ruling — attempting to draw a line between official and unofficial acts.

"This case poses a question of lasting significance: When may a former President be prosecuted for official acts taken during his Presidency? In answering that question, unlike the political branches and the public at large, the Court cannot afford to fixate exclusively, or even primarily, on present exigencies. Enduring separation of powers principles guide our decision in this case. The President enjoys no immunity for his unofficial acts, and not everything the President does is official. The President is not above the law. But under our system of separated powers, the President may not be prosecuted for exercising his core constitutional powers, and he is entitled to at least presumptive immunity from prosecution for his official acts. That immunity applies equally to all occupants of the Oval Office," Roberts wrote.

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/live-blog/trump-immunity-supreme-court-ruling-live-updates-rcna159539#rcrd44922


Do something positive.




» You can also:
« FFT4 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next