>>> But then why wasn't her responses more in line with the questions?
Two rather subtle, yet brilliant reasons.
1. First - if the answers had been 'more in line' the gig would have been too obvious.
2. Second, to the UNINFORMED, the answers appeared in line with the questions, but those answers had been carefully sculpted to deliver the propaganda damn near flawlessly, with the lies and attacks carefully manicured to be delivered with a 'gleefully malicious face'.
The absence of ANY word salads at all were and are the dead give away that this was all very carefully, and professionally prepared. She had to have the questions beforehand, or else she would have taken just a tad more care to answer the questions (and the moderators to push for real answers) - but she knew what was coming, and the stage managers ruled the debate. Joseph Goebbels couldn't have done it any better. These bastards learned from the best.
Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good ...
| 
