>>>> The good news is that Donald Trump's performance was also 'good enough.' Consequently, I don't think this debate will have much of an impact on anything.
Perhaps the 'undecideds' are NOT completely brain dead.
The polling since the debate buttresses DE's position - no significant change.
I saw all the lies from Kahmunist, and the blatant lies and interference from the ABC moder-gandiests - but wrote those off as being 'not noticeable' to the presumed uninformed brain deads because of their leftist bias and lack of knowledge about the REAL truths. Assumption correct for the hard core left (phfffarters good evidence for that conclusion) but perhaps the undecideds have a little more knowledge and can actually see the obvious smoke screen blown by the Kahmunist and ABC propagandists, ie not totally brain dead.
Thus- no effective change of position for the majority of viewers.
Anne Coulter (whom I dislike) summed it up with:
But they know that life was better under Trump. And they know that Harris, like Clinton, is a nasty woman.
http://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/09/11/ann-coulter-the-debate-about-the-debate/
Perhaps my expectations for Trump were far higher than DE's so my judgement of his performance was far harsher than that of DE.
Tulsi also comes down on DE's side:
“She’s got Hollywood advisers, stages, the Hollywood lights in the hopes that her friends in ABC and propaganda media declare her the winner. And that may be enough to trick the voters to vote for her. But I don’t think American people are going to fall for this.”
http://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2024/09/11/tulsi-gabbard-kamala-harris-took-acting-lessons-with-hollywood-advisors-before-abc-debate/
Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good ...
| 
