Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
Replies to Msg. #1252312
.
 Msg. #  Subject Posted by    Board    Date   
59285 Re: New sunglasses
   [b]De sez ~ "They look fine - but I'm not a social butterfly - un... 		Beldin   6TH POPE   11 Oct 2024
 6:22 PM
59281 Re: New sunglasses
   I had corneal transplants over 20 years ago. I wear my prescription s... 		CTJ   6TH POPE   11 Oct 2024
 5:23 PM

The above list shows replies to the following message:

Re: New sunglasses

By: De_Composed in 6TH POPE
Fri, 11 Oct 24 4:11 PM
Msg. 59280 of 59721
(This msg. is a reply to 59278 by CTJ)
Jump to msg. #  

CTJ:

Re: “I picked up my new prescription lenses for my sunglasses. Just the lenses.” I save money where I can.

Rather than getting pricey bi-focals or tri-focals, a few months ago I bought several pairs of single prescription glasses dedicated to distance, computer use or reading. It's the second time I've done that. I buy three styles of frames so it's obvious which pair does what.

I hardly ever use the distance glasses. I had lasik 25 years ago and my distance vision is still decent.

While I went low end, the on-line seller had a nice selection of both plastic and metal frames. They look fine - but I'm not a social butterfly - unlike most of this board's members - so who cares? I passed on scratch resistant lenses, ultra-thin lenses, transition lenses and tinted lenses. I re-used my last prescription.

I wanted replacement glasses because I'd lost two pairs, scratched two others and stepped on one pair while mowing a field. Entirely my fault.

Every four years or so, I'll get an exam. Cataracts run in my family, so a doctor should check my eyes every so often.

Oh, the price. I paid $10 per pair - up from $6 per pair 18 months ago.

I didn't buy prescription sunglasses since I don't like them, but I could have. If everything else had stayed the same, they would have been $20 apiece.