« FFT4 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Judge in Trump hush money case delays key ruling ahead of sentencing

By: weco in FFT4 | Recommend this post (0)
Wed, 13 Nov 24 4:21 AM | 7 view(s)
Boardmark this board | FFT4
Msg. 13822 of 13858
(This msg. is a reply to 13812 by clo2)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Just how many times do you have to listen to the same request with different arguments?

Dismiss before trial because the evidence is insufficient. Denied.
Dismiss before trial because I'm running for office. Denied.
Dismiss during trial because someone did something. Denied.
Dismiss after both sides rest and before the jury verdict because the evidence was insufficient. Denied.
Dismiss after the verdict because the jury erred in their verdict. Denied.
Dismiss after the verdict because I'm further along in the process of running for office. Denied.
Dismiss after the verdict because the USSC made some ruling. Waiting on this one.
Dismiss after the verdict because I won the election. Just made today.

At what point does this become a vexatious litigant? At what point does the judge hold you (or your counsel) in contempt for making frivolous arguments and/or motions?

Yes, you need to listen to arguments. But if you don't cut off arguments at some point, they will go on forever and you'll never close the case.


- -




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Judge in Trump hush money case delays key ruling ahead of sentencing
By: clo2
in FFT4
Tue, 12 Nov 24 5:20 PM
Msg. 13812 of 13858

Judge in Trump hush money case delays key ruling ahead of sentencing

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/judge-trump-hush-money-case-delays-key-ruling-ahead-sentencing-rcna179763?


« FFT4 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next