Msg. 01849 of 02085 (This msg. is a reply to
01831 by
De_Composed)
Jump:
It does appear that the Dems are afraid of what Trump may well unearth a ton of corruption in the Biden administration and find out who the shadow government really was. Not mentioning any names like Obonzo directing things but it sure as the devil wasn't sleepy Joe.
I would like the answer as to why sleepy and part time Joe wasn't declared unfit for office by the Medical doctor?
Was he willing to say under penalty of death that Biden was sharp as a tack and mentally fit for the office? Could he kindly explain all the required absences and time spent on the beach while supposedly being the President?
THAT scumbag needs to have his medical license revoked and be gone as well. Hope it happens.
There should be consequences for an illegal and massive cover up and answers found and made public about WHO was really running the White House for four years....
If ya let the Dems get away with this charade it will be a precedent for the future..
Two Democrat lawyers called for Congress to block President-elect Donald Trump from taking office in an op-ed published by the Hill on Thursday, prompting disbelief and ridicule from Republicans.
In the piece titled “Congress has the power to block Trump from taking office, but lawmakers must act now,” lawyers Evan A. Davis and David M. Schulte argued that the Constitution says an insurrectionist is ineligible to be president and “the evidence of Donald Trump’s engaging in such insurrection is overwhelming.”
They argued that the “matter has been decided in three separate forums” — one of which they said was the Rep. Nancy Pelosi-appointed January 6th Committee — which a recent House Republican review into the committee concluded was “designed to promote a political narrative” and a “tool to attack President Trump.”
Eric Trump, Trump’s second-eldest son, posted on X: “You people are sick.”
Davis Schulte also argued that counting the Electoral College votes “is a matter uniquely assigned to Congress by the Constitution” — which some Republicans pointed out was the same argument Trump was attacked for when he urged Congress to hold off on certifying the 2020 election results until irregularities were fully mitigated.
Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-MO) posted on X sarcastically: “Sounds like inciting an Insurrection.”
Davis and Schulte argued that the 1887 Electoral Count Act provided two grounds for objection to an electoral vote: “if the electors from a state were not lawfully certified or if the vote of one or more electors was not ‘regularly given.'” They argued: “A vote for a candidate disqualified by the Constitution is plainly in accordance with the normal use of words ‘not regularly given.'”
They said 20 percent of the House and Senate were required to make an objection under the Count Act, and if the objection is sustained by a majority vote in the House and Senate, the electoral votes for Trump would not be counted and Kamala Harris would be elected president.
They argued that while Republicans would not likely go along with this, “Democrats need to take a stand.”
Steven Cheung, a spokesman for the Trump transition team, posted, “Oh, look. Democrats want to steal the election and invalidate the will of the American people.”
Trump campaign adviser Alex Bruesewitz noted that former U.S. Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey Clark was politically persecuted for drafting a memo proposing a legal avenue to challenge the 2020 election results — as Davis and Schulte are doing.
Davis and Schulte argued that the second forum was Trump’s second impeachment trial over the January 6 Capitol riot — despite the Senate acquitting Trump for “incitement of insurrection.”
Breitbart News senior legal contributor Ken Klukowski called their argument “ridiculous.”
“Only the Democrat-controlled House brought that accusation, and then the Senate acquitted President Trump of that impeachment count, and for anyone who is confused about what that means, the legal reality is that when you are acquitted of something, then you are by definition not guilty of it,” he said.
“President Trump was never even charged with engaging in an insurrection, to say nothing of being convicted of that crime,” Klukowski added.
Davis and Schulte argued the third forum was the Colorado Supreme Court affirming a lower court’s finding that Trump engaged in insurrection in an effort to keep Trump off the ballot.
Despite the U.S. Supreme Court in Trump v. Anderson then finding that states lack power to disqualify candidates for federal office, Davis and Schulte argued that the ruling amount to “dicta,” or “musings of an opinion that are not required to decide the case.”
Klukowski, who authored a brief in Trump v. Anderson representing former U.S. attorneys general from three different presidential administrations, called that argument “utterly absurd.”
“That is a holding of the court, not dicta, and Congress is obligated to follow it,” Klukowski said.
While the op-ed did not specify the authors’ political leanings, Davis is a lawyer at Cleary Gottlieb who represented the late Democrat New York Gov. Mario Cuomo and also was a Democrat candidate for New York attorney general in 1998.
Meanwhile, David Schulte is a lawyer at Chilmark Partners, a Chicago investment banker, and a “friend and financial supporter” of former President Barack Obama, as well as a friend of former President Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton, according to the Chicago Magazine.
DON'T BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS WEBSITE!
The reader is responsible for discerning the validity, factuality or implications of information posted here, be it fictional or based on real events. Moderators on this forum make every effort to review the material posted on this site however, it is not realistically possible for a one man team to manually review each and every one of the posts atomicbobs.com gets on a daily basis.
The content of posts on this site, including but not limited to links to other web sites, are the expressed opinion of the original poster and are in no way representative of or endorsed by the owners or administration of this website. The posts on this website are the opinion of the specific author and are not statements of advice, opinion, or factual information on behalf of the owner or administration of Atomicbob’s. This site may contain adult language, if you feel you might be offended by such content, you should log off immediately.
Not all posts on this website are intended as truthful or factual assertion by their authors. Some users of this website are participating in internet role playing, with or without the use of an avatar. NO post on this website should be considered factual information on face value alone. Users are encouraged to
USE DISCERNMENT
and do their own follow up research while reading and posting on this website. Atomicbobs.com reserves the right to make changes to, corrections and/or remove entirely at any time posts made on this website without notice. In addition, Atomicbobs.com disclaims any and all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of a post on this website.
This website implements certain security features in order to prevent spam and posting abuse. By making a post on this website you consent to any automated security checks required by our system to authenticate your IP address as belonging to an actual human. It is forbidden to make posts on this website from open proxy servers. By making a post on this website you consent to an automated one time limited port scan of your IP address which is required by our security system to validate the authenticity of your internet connection.
This site is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. You should not assume that this site is error-free or that it will be suitable for the particular purpose which you have in mind when using it. In no event shall Atomicbobs.com be liable for any special, incidental, indirect or consequential damages of any kind, or any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
Some events depicted in certain posting and threads on this website may be fictitious and any similarity to any person living or dead is merely coincidental. Some other articles may be based on actual events but which in certain cases incidents, characters and timelines have been changed for dramatic purposes. Certain characters may be composites, or entirely fictitious.
We do not discriminate against the mentally ill!
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to civil rights, economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science & technology, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
At some point freedom of speech and copyright law merge. The following interpretation of "Fair Use" and subsequent posting policy were developed with the assistance of qualified legal council however, we are not lawyers and cannot offer you legal advise as to the limits of "Fair Use"
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
Though legally each situation is evaluated independently according to guidelines that were intentionally left open to interpretation, we believe generally this policy represents "Fair Use" of any such copyrighted material for the purposes of education and discussion.
You are responsible for what you "publish" on the internet. You must be sure any copyrighted material you choose to post for discussion on this forum falls within the limits of "Fair Use" as defined by the law.
If you are a legal copyright holder or a designated agent for such and you believe a post on this website falls outside the boundaries of "Fair Use" and legitimately infringes on yours or your clients copyright
we may be contacted concerning copyright matters at:
If you require a courier address please send a fax or email and we will provide you with the required information.
For expedited human review & removal of potential copyright violations we encourage users & copyright holders to utilize the "Report Copyright Violation" button that accompanies each post published on this website.
In accordance with section 512 of the U.S. Copyright Act our contact information has been registered with the United States Copyright Office. "Safe Harbor" noticing procedures as outlined in the DMCA apply to this website concerning all 3rd party posts published herein.
If notice is given of an alleged copyright violation we will act expeditiously to remove or disable access to the material(s) in question. It is our strict policy to disable access to accounts of repeat copyright violators. We will also ban the IP address of repeat offenders from future posting on this website with or without a registered account.
All 3rd party material posted on this website is copyright the respective owners / authors. Atomicbobs.com makes no claim of copyright on such material.
Please be aware any communications sent complaining about a post on this website may be posted publicly at the discretion of the administration.
---
DON'T BREAK THE LAW!
---
Other than that you can do / say whatever you want on this forum.
We reserve the right to block access to this website by any individual or organization at any time for any reason whatsoever or no reason at all.
| 
