Of all the teams they rated in the top 4 , not a single one made it past their first game after getting additional week off to play their first game.
What does that tell you about the ones who showed lots of bias but knew very little about the actual teams?
I'm really confident about their decisions for the future.
How about you?
IN short, those experts weren't even remotely close to knowing the strengths of the teams..
I'm pretty sure a chimpanzee could have thrown darts at a board with the teams names on it and done better.
Just an observation...