T o put it bluntly, Jill Biden’s time as first lady has been a complete train wreck.
Even Jill Biden is on the verge of admitting it. In a full-ranging interview with the Washington Post this week, the first lady confessed, “Let’s just say I was disappointed with how it unfolded” — with “it” being her and Joe’s time in the White House.
When prompted to answer why she felt that way, Jill vaguely said: “I don’t know. I learned a lot about human nature.”
This was intended to be a dig at Nancy Pelosi and other Democrats who rightly forced Joe Biden out of the presidential race due to his cognitive incapacity. In Jill’s view, this was a betrayal of friendship. To her, Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer should have done everything possible to keep Biden in the race because of their decades-long close relationship with the Biden family.
“We were friends for 50 years,” Jill said of Pelosi’s effort to force Biden out. “It was disappointing.”
What about the security and well-being of her nation — the one that is home to 335 million of her fellow Americans? Well, that’s a much lower priority than Nancy Pelosi being a good “friend.”
It’s easy to see why so many have compared Jill Biden to Lady Macbeth. She certainly seems to be a woman who, motivated by her own power, orchestrated her husband’s treacherous attempt to be reelected president. (Treacherous because Joe’s cognitive dysfunction made him unfit for office.)
Jill Biden’s interview with the Washington Post served only to reinforce the narrative that it was she who was the animating force behind that widely denounced reelection bid.
Whereas Joe Biden confessed the other week, “I don’t know. Who the hell knows?” when asked whether he would have been able to serve as president another four years, Jill Biden was adamant that of course, he would have been capable. “Sure,” she said. “I mean, today, I think he has a full schedule. He started early with interviews and briefings, and it just keeps going.”
Jill seemed to be Biden’s foremost defender upon his disastrous debate performance in June — content to not bat an eye at the Democratic meltdown over his awful performance. (“Joe, you did such a great job! You answered every question!”)
It has been reported that, well before that disastrous debate, it was Jill who convinced Biden to wage another bid for the White House.
In 2023, Politico published a report on how she managed to get him on board. It was through “gentle encouragement,” wrote Eugene Daniels. “Privately,” Daniels said, “the first lady encouraged her husband to run again while giving him the space he needed to process the decision in the way he traditionally does.” Jill, said the report, had “no reservations” about a reelection bid and was “involved in all the high-level discussions around the decision.” Jill’s response at the time to those who asserted that Biden had “lost a step” was to “bristle” at such criticism, Daniels reported.
Of course, we know now that Jill Biden was well aware of what was going on behind the scenes. According to Carl Bernstein, Biden had acted as he did in the debate on at least “15, 20 occasions” in the year and a half prior to that fateful night. Bernstein explained on CNN: “[T]hese people who have supported him, loved him, campaigned for him, see him often, say that in the last six months particularly, there has been a marked incidence of cognitive decline and physical infirmity.” If Joe was this bad when he was on the clock, imagine how bad he was late at night or early in the morning with Jill.
We also know that there was a purposeful coverup that attempted to shield Joe Biden’s condition. This was carried out even to the extent that members of the White House residence staff — the employees who work in the first family’s private quarters — were kept away from Joe.
“Joe Biden’s close aides have carefully shielded him from people inside and outside the White House since the beginning of his presidency,” reported Alex Thompson in Axios. And, according to Thompson, this was at the behest of Jill Biden’s top aide as well as her deputy chief of staff. Thompson quoted one former White House residence official who said Jill was “so protective of the president, and then [Jill’s top aide] just protects her, and they often wouldn’t let us do anything for them.” Here we have evidence that Jill Biden was orchestrating the coverup of her husband’s cognitive decline — a decline she undoubtedly was familiar with.
Even when Democrats were begging for Joe to exit the race, it was Jill who urged her husband to stay on. At a Biden family gathering at Camp David — for the sake of a photoshoot by Annie Leibovitz — it was reported that Jill and Hunter Biden adamantly encouraged Joe to stay in the race, even as many Democrats were saying that it was up to Jill to convince him to do the right thing and step aside. That weekend was the same one Jill’s Vogue cover hit shelves. Many saw in that cover the reason why Jill was insisting that Joe stay in the race: She didn’t want to give up her White House lifestyle.
In response to the backlash at the time, Jill’s communications director, Elizabeth Alexander, told the media that Jill Biden had been put in “an impossible situation” because of “the right wing machine fueling narratives and inventing false caricatures at every turn.” Alexander explained that women across the country struggle with being supportive of the men in their lives without “being too ambitious or aggressive,” according to the Associated Press. Essentially, the claim was that all of the critiques of Jill were just a trumped-up right-wing narrative rooted in sexism.
This is quite rich. If anything, it is Democrats who are the most morally outraged at Jill’s power-hungry antics. But they shouldn’t be alone in their anger. This is a woman who was so selfish that she sought to thrust the entire world into the perilous situation of another four years of an incapable president. Not even Edith Wilson attempted to deceive Americans into electing her husband for another term in power.
If there’s one good thing we can say about Jill Biden, it’s that she has at least stopped insisting we refer to her as “Dr.” Jill Biden. Likely, it got too embarrassing for her to keep that one up. We could laud her as well for finally recognizing her granddaughter who was born out of wedlock — though that acknowledgment was made under duress and after the child was 4 years old.
All in all, Jill Biden has been a disastrous first lady and a danger to her own nation. No wonder she’s so disappointed.
DON'T BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS WEBSITE!
The reader is responsible for discerning the validity, factuality or implications of information posted here, be it fictional or based on real events. Moderators on this forum make every effort to review the material posted on this site however, it is not realistically possible for a one man team to manually review each and every one of the posts atomicbobs.com gets on a daily basis.
The content of posts on this site, including but not limited to links to other web sites, are the expressed opinion of the original poster and are in no way representative of or endorsed by the owners or administration of this website. The posts on this website are the opinion of the specific author and are not statements of advice, opinion, or factual information on behalf of the owner or administration of Atomicbobs. This site may contain adult language, if you feel you might be offended by such content, you should log off immediately.
Not all posts on this website are intended as truthful or factual assertion by their authors. Some users of this website are participating in internet role playing, with or without the use of an avatar. NO post on this website should be considered factual information on face value alone. Users are encouraged to
USE DISCERNMENT
and do their own follow up research while reading and posting on this website. Atomicbobs.com reserves the right to make changes to, corrections and/or remove entirely at any time posts made on this website without notice. In addition, Atomicbobs.com disclaims any and all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of a post on this website.
This website implements certain security features in order to prevent spam and posting abuse. By making a post on this website you consent to any automated security checks required by our system to authenticate your IP address as belonging to an actual human. It is forbidden to make posts on this website from open proxy servers. By making a post on this website you consent to an automated one time limited port scan of your IP address which is required by our security system to validate the authenticity of your internet connection.
This site is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. You should not assume that this site is error-free or that it will be suitable for the particular purpose which you have in mind when using it. In no event shall Atomicbobs.com be liable for any special, incidental, indirect or consequential damages of any kind, or any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
Some events depicted in certain posting and threads on this website may be fictitious and any similarity to any person living or dead is merely coincidental. Some other articles may be based on actual events but which in certain cases incidents, characters and timelines have been changed for dramatic purposes. Certain characters may be composites, or entirely fictitious.
We do not discriminate against the mentally ill!
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to civil rights, economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science & technology, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
At some point freedom of speech and copyright law merge. The following interpretation of "Fair Use" and subsequent posting policy were developed with the assistance of qualified legal council however, we are not lawyers and cannot offer you legal advise as to the limits of "Fair Use"
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
Though legally each situation is evaluated independently according to guidelines that were intentionally left open to interpretation, we believe generally this policy represents "Fair Use" of any such copyrighted material for the purposes of education and discussion.
You are responsible for what you "publish" on the internet. You must be sure any copyrighted material you choose to post for discussion on this forum falls within the limits of "Fair Use" as defined by the law.
If you are a legal copyright holder or a designated agent for such and you believe a post on this website falls outside the boundaries of "Fair Use" and legitimately infringes on yours or your clients copyright
we may be contacted concerning copyright matters at:
If you require a courier address please send a fax or email and we will provide you with the required information.
For expedited human review & removal of potential copyright violations we encourage users & copyright holders to utilize the "Report Copyright Violation" button that accompanies each post published on this website.
In accordance with section 512 of the U.S. Copyright Act our contact information has been registered with the United States Copyright Office. "Safe Harbor" noticing procedures as outlined in the DMCA apply to this website concerning all 3rd party posts published herein.
If notice is given of an alleged copyright violation we will act expeditiously to remove or disable access to the material(s) in question. It is our strict policy to disable access to accounts of repeat copyright violators. We will also ban the IP address of repeat offenders from future posting on this website with or without a registered account.
All 3rd party material posted on this website is copyright the respective owners / authors. Atomicbobs.com makes no claim of copyright on such material.
Please be aware any communications sent complaining about a post on this website may be posted publicly at the discretion of the administration.
---
DON'T BREAK THE LAW!
---
Other than that you can do / say whatever you want on this forum.
We reserve the right to block access to this website by any individual or organization at any time for any reason whatsoever or no reason at all.