« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Rebecca Lobach 

By: ribit in GRITZ | Recommend this post (2)
Tue, 04 Feb 25 3:06 AM | 18 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Grits Breakfast of Champeens!
Msg. 03485 of 04547
(This msg. is a reply to 03477 by De_Composed)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

...against women in combat. They would be a distraction. They would lend disciplinary problems within the ranks. Mostly men only have enough blood to run one head at a time.




Avatar

Liberals are like a "Slinky". Totally useless, but somehow ya can't help but smile when you see one tumble down a flight of stairs!


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Rebecca Lobach
By: De_Composed
in GRITZ
Tue, 04 Feb 25 1:19 AM
Msg. 03477 of 04547

Zimbler0:

Re: “Just how did 'being female' cause her to crash the helicopter?”
My opinion is that females do not fare well versus males in many physical contests - excepting only those in which shorter stature and lesser weight can be advantageous (jockeying, balancing, skeet shooting, endurance events.) Or when body fat plays a role: Distance swimming and resisting cold. Additionally, I think females are MUCH worse at coping with fear. I've seen women literally freeze / turn adolescent in a crisis. I've never seen a man do that, though I know it can happen... for instance, when drowning. To some extent, this matters when talking about pilots who may have split seconds in which to think their way through a terrifying situation.

I'd be curious as to what ribit and micro think about women on the battlefield, yea or nay. And why.






« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next