« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Yossi Gestetner On Trump Classified Documents 

By: micro in GRITZ | Recommend this post (2)
Mon, 10 Feb 25 1:06 AM | 16 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Grits Breakfast of Champeens!
Msg. 03783 of 04606
(This msg. is a reply to 03782 by CTJ)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

paybacks are hell.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Yossi Gestetner On Trump Classified Documents
By: CTJ
in GRITZ
Mon, 10 Feb 25 12:17 AM
Msg. 03782 of 04606

This whole thing was rigged by Biden 

1/5 Biden deputized the National Archivist to revoke Trump's executive privilege on already-held docs.

This made holding these docs (even non-classified ones) "illegal" and the Biden DOJ then used this "violation" of NARA (National Archive & Records Asmin) as key reason to raid.

2/5 Biden deputizing the National Archivist was reveled in a Spring 2022 letter to Team Trump notifying them that she revoked his privileges.

READ the application to raid and see that it speaks extensively about NARA; which is independent of any claims about classified docs!

3/5 It get's worse, of the 30+ documents that Trump was charged with (from among 11K taken), the Feds never argued that those are classified since the Feds knew that Trump may have declassified them, which is why the Feds kept using the term "documents marked classified."

4/5 Basically, Joe Biden was DIRECTLY involved in an action that led to the raid on @realDonaldTrump by retroactively revoking a privilege which created a "criminality" by Trump, so... I DONT CARE if Trump revokes privileges of the hacks who tried to take him out.

5/5 Here is the relevant part of the letter that the National Archivist sent to Team Trump a few months before the raid. It was reported by @JustTheNews and then highlighted to the four walls by @julie_kelly2 (and me).

"The Counsel to the President has informed me that, in light of the particular circumstances presented here, President Biden defers to my determination, in consultation with the Assistant Attorney
General for the Office of Legal Counsel, regarding whether or not I should uphold the former President's purported 'protective assertion of executive privilege,'" Wall wrote.
"... I have therefore decided not to honor the former President's 'protective' claim of privilege.


« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next