« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Zelensky says, f*ck Trump

By: micro in GRITZ | Recommend this post (0)
Wed, 05 Mar 25 5:19 PM | 9 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Grits Breakfast of Champeens!
Msg. 05081 of 05115
(This msg. is a reply to 05062 by Zimbler0)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

so basically China's economic data coming from them is the star of a "dog and pony show".

It actually belongs in a Hog farm where it can be used as the slop it actually is..




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Zelensky says, f*ck Trump
By: Zimbler0
in GRITZ
Wed, 05 Mar 25 2:59 AM
Msg. 05062 of 05115

Decomposed > That's fine if you see some sign of it. But you shouldn't ASSUME it. That would be silly.


That is true, De.
Which is why I typed 'it would not surprise me'. Meaning it might be accurate.

But, I did not find what I would call 'firm' GDP figures for Russia for 2024.

The invasion of Ukraine was 2022. According to the GDP figures I cited, Russian GDP was down by some 10% in 2023.

It is possible 2024's GDP was similar to 2023 - but that would still be down 10% from 2022.

And then China has its own 'misleading statistics' . .

>>>
China’s Misleading Economic Indicators

http://carnegieendowment.org/posts/2014/08/chinas-misleading-economic-indicators?lang=en

August 29, 2014
Whether one feels positive or negative about China’s economic prospects, everyone can agree that its indicators are a mess. But the fact that the data are flawed does not mean that they are deliberately manipulated to yield a particular outcome.

These distortions affect two key policy concerns that dominate public attention. One has to do with purportedly overstated gross domestic product growth rates. The other involves perceptions about China’s unbalanced growth as reflected in its extremely low consumption share of GDP and high investment share.

Many China watchers believe that officials have deliberately overstated economic growth figures to meet plan targets, citing for example that the sum of provincial growth rates exceeds the reported national rate. Local officials probably do exaggerate but other factors such as double-counting of cross-provincial activities and differing methodologies play a larger role which the centre then reconciles through separate surveys.
>>>

(Article does continue. Zim.)


« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next