« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Russian Raiders Crawled For Miles

By: Zimbler0 in GRITZ | Recommend this post (0)
Thu, 13 Mar 25 3:04 AM | 8 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Grits Breakfast of Champeens!
Msg. 05330 of 05355
(This msg. is a reply to 05303 by fizzy)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Point One : the The "Great Gas Pipeline Caper of 2025" Reads more like Russian propaganda than reality. Having seen two different 'versions' now . . .

Point two : The N.Koreans did NOT stop the 'American hedgemon' - it took the entire Chinese Army to drive the 'Allied' (mostly American) forces back down to the current DMZ.

>>>
Iraq, on the other hand, was a huge loss: we have LESS respect and influence in the region now than we had when Sadam was keeping ISIS, Iran, and Al Queda at bay.
>>>

Iraq - post invasion we learned had at least one 'binary nerve gas' artillery shell. Iraq also had many empty chemical warheads. And all those 'pesticides' found stored in Ammunition Storage Facilities - were those multiple drums per site REALLY 'harmless pesticides' . . . (by the way, morons, pesticides are NOT harmless.) . . or were they ersatz nerve agents manufactured by 'dual use' pesticide manufacturing plants.

I was watching and reading all the news regarding Iraq between the two U.S. and Iraq wars. Saddam Hussein had numerous WMD programs. Saddam had nuclear ambitions. And the 'Saddam had ZERO WMD's' was a politically based demo-rat LIE. And most of U.S. know full well the demon-crapper party will LIE to 'We The People'.

I could go on . . and on and on . . But does anybody really want to hear it?

Saddam Hussein was a rude dude who needed to be removed from the world stage. Bush was not trying to 'profit' from that removal. I believe Bush wanted to give the Iraqi Peoples a chance at honest governance. (And remove saddams WMD ambitions.)

I could be wrong . . . But I don't think so. I could list more reasons.

Zim.




Avatar

Mad Poet Strikes Again.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Russian Raiders Crawled For Miles
By: fizzy
in GRITZ
Wed, 12 Mar 25 8:00 PM
Msg. 05303 of 05355

The more commplete story is finally coming out. Much bigger deal than we have been imagining:
http://terrycowan.substack.com/p/the-great-gas-pipeline-caper-of-2025


As the article points out, IF this had been done by the US, or any other "Western" nation, it would be TOTALLY DOMINATING all the news stations, talk shows, and other media. Indeed, we all know that movie rights would be a hot commodity and the filming would probably be underway by approximately next week.

But because the brilliance and audacity all came from "Russia, Russia, Russia" and doesn't paint Ukraine, Europe, nor the US in a bright light, it is unlikely to ever make Demonrat news stations in any detail. And the movie, if it is made, will probably be launched in Russia, and unlikely to win even honorable mention at the Oscars.

Americans need to recognize that our "military" is obsolete in both tech but -- mostly -- in daring. Yes, the military has been "wokenized" over the last 20 years or so, placing pagentry above actual performance. But, most of all, we've been choosing our fights based mostly upon "Corporate profits" and "Banksterism", and what benefits the Deep State (and Cling-Ons with desk jobs) for all of the last 75 years.

War-time daring requires a lot of things but it starts with actually desperation: a clear recognition that if you don't win, your FAMILY will likely be wiped out. That is why the N. Koreans were able to fight the US hegemon to a standstill, why Vietnam was lost, and why nearly none of the "wars" and skirmishes since have actually been significant...and all of those which were significant have, arguably, actually, been LOST.

But you won't hear that rationally and logically discussed in government, of course, because NeoCons and NeoLibs generally lack fundamental self-honesty, courage, and integrity.

Historically, "won" wars should be net PROFITABLE on a decades-into-the-future basis. WW2 meets that test -- it opened up the world for US products and exports. Iraq, on the other hand, was a huge loss: we have LESS respect and influence in the region now than we had when Sadam was keeping ISIS, Iran, and Al Queda at bay.

Most of can't logically clear that hurtle in our heads because it requires INTEGRITY and self-honesty and a PERSONAL willingness to put EVERYTHING we personally hold most dear on the line. So we don't go; and the "elites" don't send their children. We can't do that anymore...because NONE of these wars were actually required for OUR self-preservation as individual people.

Trump put his life -- and his childrens' lives -- on the line. THAT is why he won.


« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next