« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Just Ask Grok: Who will the 2028 Presidential nominees be? 

By: De_Composed in GRITZ | Recommend this post (1)
Tue, 15 Apr 25 4:58 AM | 18 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Grits Breakfast of Champeens!
Msg. 06740 of 07123
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Q: Pretend you are a political analyst working for the New York Times. Who would you guess the Republican and Democrat Presidential nominees will be in 2028?

A: As a political analyst for The New York Times, my assessment of the 2028 presidential nominees for both parties hinges on current trends, historical patterns, and the political landscape as of April 2025, while acknowledging the unpredictability of a race still three years away. Below, I outline my best-educated guesses for the Republican and Democratic nominees, grounded in analysis of key players, party dynamics, and voter sentiment.

Republican Nominee: J.D. Vance

Rationale:
Vice Presidential Advantage: J.D. Vance, as the sitting vice president in 2025, holds a formidable position within the Republican Party. Historically, vice presidents have a strong track record of securing their party’s nomination—think Walter Mondale, George H.W. Bush, Al Gore, and Joe Biden. Vance’s current role gives him national visibility, access to donors, and a platform to shape the GOP’s post-Trump agenda.

MAGA Continuity: Vance has fully embraced Trump’s populist brand, aligning himself with the MAGA base that remains the GOP’s dominant force. His rhetoric on trade, immigration, and cultural issues resonates with Trump’s core voters, positioning him as the heir apparent to the movement. Unlike Mike Pence, who alienated the base in 2020, Vance has cultivated loyalty among Trump supporters, avoiding any public rifts.

Youth and Energy: At 40 in 2025, Vance offers a younger face for the GOP, contrasting with aging establishment figures. His background as a senator, author, and veteran appeals to a broad spectrum of Republicans, from working-class voters to intellectual conservatives. His performance in the 2024 vice-presidential debate against Tim Walz showcased his ability to articulate a vision while deflecting criticism, a skill critical for a primary fight.

Competitive Field: Other potential contenders—Ron DeSantis, Nikki Haley, Brian Kemp, or Glenn Youngkin—face hurdles. DeSantis’s 2024 primary loss to Trump damaged his momentum, and his appeal may be too regional (Florida-focused). Haley, while popular with moderates, struggles with the MAGA base’s distrust of her establishment ties. Kemp and Youngkin, though successful governors, lack Vance’s national profile and Trump endorsement, which remains a kingmaker. A January 2025 poll showed Vance leading with 27% among Republicans, ahead of Donald Trump Jr. (21%) and DeSantis (8%), signaling his early edge.

Risks: Vance’s rise depends on a successful vice presidency. If Trump’s second term falters—say, due to economic stagnation or policy overreach—Vance could face backlash as part of the administration. Additionally, a crowded primary with figures like Vivek Ramaswamy or Marco Rubio could split the populist vote, though Vance’s institutional advantages likely outweigh these threats.

Why Vance?: The GOP in 2028 will likely prioritize continuity with Trump’s legacy over a return to pre-2016 establishment politics. Vance’s youth, loyalty, and ability to bridge MAGA and broader conservative voters make him the frontrunner, assuming he avoids major missteps.

Democratic Nominee: Josh Shapiro

Rationale:
Swing-State Strength: Josh Shapiro, Pennsylvania’s governor, has emerged as a rising star with a proven ability to win in a critical battleground state. His 2022 gubernatorial victory and 56% approval rating in 2025 highlight his appeal to moderates and independents, key demographics Democrats must reclaim after 2024’s losses. Pennsylvania’s 19 electoral votes are a linchpin, and Shapiro’s local dominance gives him a strategic edge.

Moderate Appeal: Shapiro’s pragmatic, center-left governing style—emphasizing jobs, education, and infrastructure while avoiding polarizing cultural debates—positions him to unite a fractured Democratic Party. Unlike progressive figures like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who face skepticism from swing voters, or Gavin Newsom, whose California liberalism carries baggage, Shapiro projects competence without ideological baggage. His work with Republicans as attorney general and governor bolsters his bipartisan credentials.

2024 Lessons: Kamala Harris’s 2024 defeat exposed Democrats’ struggles with working-class and Latino voters, particularly in Rust Belt states. Shapiro’s focus on economic populism and his ability to connect with blue-collar communities address these weaknesses. His decision to campaign heavily for Harris in 2024, despite her loss, earned him goodwill among party loyalists, unlike Tim Walz, whose national profile faded post-election.

Competitive Field: Other contenders—Harris, Newsom, Pete Buttigieg, Gretchen Whitmer, or Andy Beshear—face challenges. Harris, despite 41% support in a 2024 Puck poll, carries the weight of her 2024 loss and struggles with voter enthusiasm. Newsom’s progressive record and California’s homelessness critiques alienate moderates. Buttigieg, while a strong communicator, lacks an electoral base post-Cabinet. Whitmer’s Michigan record is solid, but her gender may spark hesitancy after Harris’s defeat, with some Democrats wary of nominating another woman too soon. Beshear’s Kentucky wins are impressive, but his national name recognition lags.

Risks: Shapiro’s relative moderation could alienate the party’s progressive wing, especially if AOC or another leftist mounts a strong primary challenge. His 2024 decision to back Harris over a more open primary drew quiet criticism, which could resurface. Additionally, a poor 2026 midterm for Democrats could weaken governors like Shapiro if Republicans gain ground in Pennsylvania.

Why Shapiro?: Democrats in 2028 will likely prioritize electability over ideology, seeking a candidate who can win back the Rust Belt and appeal to moderates without alienating the base. Shapiro’s track record, swing-state roots, and ability to project steady leadership make him the strongest bet in a wide-open field.



Broader Context and Caveats

Republican Dynamics: The GOP primary will be a battle to inherit Trump’s mantle, with Vance’s vice-presidential platform giving him a head start. However, if Trump’s second term sours or a dark-horse populist (e.g., Ramaswamy) gains traction, the race could shift. The party’s shift toward populism makes a pre-Trump figure like Haley less viable.

Democratic Dynamics: Democrats face a reckoning after 2024, with debates over whether to tack left or center. Shapiro’s ability to bridge these divides—progressive enough on issues like abortion, moderate enough on economics—gives him an edge. Yet, the party’s hunger for a transformative figure could elevate a wildcard like Buttigieg or even Michelle Obama, though her candidacy remains speculative.

Unpredictability: Three years out, scandals, economic shifts, or global crises could reshape the field. The 2026 midterms will be a critical barometer—strong Republican gains could boost Vance’s case, while Democratic wins could embolden Shapiro or others. Swing states like Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Arizona will remain focal points.

Final Guess: J.D. Vance for the Republicans, Josh Shapiro for the Democrats. Both reflect their parties’ current trajectories—Vance as the MAGA torchbearer, Shapiro as the pragmatic unifier—while offering the youth and energy needed for a post-Trump, post-Biden era.


- - - - -
View Replies (2) »



» You can also:
« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next