« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Panama City Approves Bitcoin and Crypto Payments for Taxes, Fees, and Permits 

By: Zimbler0 in GRITZ | Recommend this post (1)
Sat, 19 Apr 25 2:24 AM | 10 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Grits Breakfast of Champeens!
Msg. 06976 of 07141
(This msg. is a reply to 06939 by Fiz)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Fiz > You would want this U$B established with super-broad support, with little room for politics-as-usual further dividing the country.


There ain't no way U.S. Bitcoin is NOT going to have political chicanery baked into it.

What 'value' is backing the American Dollar? The American economy . . the U.S. government faithfully supporting the dollar? (As we saw, bidenflation was caused by the obiden administration practicing political chicanery . . .) But, the dollar is seen as having value and it is the 'method of choice' in business transactions.

What 'value' has Gold? I can't buy groceries with it (at least not in the stores I frequent). But it does have value and can be 'sold' for dollars with which I can buy other things. It has value because it is a highly desired substance - whether for adorning Women or keeping as a hedge against inflation, it does have value.

But what 'intrinsic value' does BitCoin have?

Zim.




Avatar

Mad Poet Strikes Again.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Panama City Approves Bitcoin and Crypto Payments for Taxes, Fees, and Permits
By: Fiz
in GRITZ
Fri, 18 Apr 25 8:49 PM
Msg. 06939 of 07141

nacl01: "With the US government maintaining the blockchain, they would eventually be watching every transaction."

Good point! So, DON'T have the US government maintain nor control the blockchain.

The US government can still mine the first 1/2 or 3/4 -- the low hanging fruit -- and hand them out to the citizens at one coin per citizens (no "favorites" and no double-dipping).

THEN the chain would then be let out into the wild for anyone who mine -- and keep the integrity of the chain. Would that (could that) work?

And, yes, of course you would need (or want) a Constitutional Amendment to grant independence of the chain, and establish the legal tender status, after the initial government "mining".


One of the big side-benefits I believe would accrue to my U$B scheme is that it would go a long, long, long way toward protecting the United States average CITIZENS protected from the collapse in the US dollar to ZERO worth, which is already well underway (at least 99.8% gone) and, imo, probably impossible to halt,

The equal distribution is also, imo, essential -- so it undoes a lot of the damage done to the middle class over the last 50 years and help equalize the GINI coefficient class division which the Leninists and banksters have created. You would want this U$B established with super-broad support, with little room for politics-as-usual further dividing the country. Of course, the "elites" wouldn't like my scheme in the least little bit. That is how we would know it was the right decision and would likely succeed.


« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next