As affirmed much, much earlier - I do NOT 'follow the science' and explained correctly why that is my position.
Getting a chuckle out of misattributions and obivous ad hominins.
Disproving an idle speculation, using the 'other side's' own 'proofs' - by showing that a proposed hypothesis is an 'evolutionary' dead end got me a couple of lectures on the 'scientific method'. LOL
On of those lectures incorrectly summarizes the 'scientific method' by completely omitting a basic of said method - that if alternative hypothesis that explain the same observed phenomenon adequately and predictively (ie can not be disproven) the original hypothesis may not be 'promoted' to a higher plain of existence.
Another amusing note is the quick resort to 'ad hominen' in the 'debate(s)'.
As we all have seen, such is the refuge of those that have run out of live ammunition. Heresy we tell you, pure heresy -iotw: you are a racist.
Still chuckling - hook, line, and stinker.
No thanks to the behooving for an open mind - an open mind can gather no thoughts - they leak out too quickly.
Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good ...
| 