« ROUND Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: �Stimulus� Has Cost $278,000 per Job

By: Beijing Bill in ROUND | Recommend this post (0)
Tue, 05 Jul 11 1:13 AM | 99 view(s)
Boardmark this board | De's Test Board
Msg. 33742 of 45510
(This msg. is a reply to 33740 by Decomposed)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

That doesn't surprise mt all about Obummer!!!




Avatar

Any clod can have the facts, but having opinions is an art. - Charles McCabe




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
‘Stimulus’ Has Cost $278,000 per Job
By: Decomposed
in ROUND
Mon, 04 Jul 11 9:24 PM
Msg. 33740 of 45510

Obama’s Economists: ‘Stimulus’ Has Cost $278,000 per Job
The stimulus is now causing the economy to shed jobs.

12:07 PM, Jul 3, 2011

By JEFFREY H. ANDERSON
The Weekly Standard


When the Obama administration releases a report on the Friday before a long weekend, it’s clearly not trying to draw attention to the report’s contents. Sure enough, the “Seventh Quarterly Report” on the economic impact of the “stimulus,” released on Friday, July 1, provides further evidence that President Obama’s economic “stimulus” did very little, if anything, to stimulate the economy, and a whole lot to stimulate the debt.

The report was written by the White House’s Council of Economic Advisors, a group of three economists who were all handpicked by Obama, and it chronicles the alleged success of the “stimulus” in adding or saving jobs. The council reports that, using “mainstream estimates of economic multipliers for the effects of fiscal stimulus” (which it describes as a “natural way to estimate the effects of” the legislation), the “stimulus” has added or saved just under 2.4 million jobs — whether private or public — at a cost (to date) of $666 billion. That’s a cost to taxpayers of $278,000 per job.

In other words, the government could simply have cut a $100,000 check to everyone whose employment was allegedly made possible by the “stimulus,” and taxpayers would have come out $427 billion ahead.

Uploaded Image

Furthermore, the council reports that, as of two quarters ago, the “stimulus” had added or saved just under 2.7 million jobs — or 288,000 more than it has now. In other words, over the past six months, the economy would have added or saved more jobs without the “stimulus” than it has with it. In comparison to how things would otherwise have been, the “stimulus” has been working in reverse over the past six months, causing the economy to shed jobs.


Full story: http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/obama-s-economists-stimulus-has-cost-278000-job_576014.html


« ROUND Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next