Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Hi Gang 

By: oldCADuser in FFFT | Recommend this post (2)
Sun, 29 Jan 12 3:31 AM | 48 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought 		Msg. 38469 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 38468 by wilful)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

In a general election, I think most people whose ideology will NOT allow them to vote for Barack Obama, will hold their nose and vote for Romney. However, he has to get past the Republican-only primaries where someone like Newt is pandering to the dreams of past glories of the 'space race' in Florida, or where he went after much more baser instincts in South Carolina, and I have no reason to believe that this 'tuning of the message for where I'm at today' will continue as long as Newt can stay in the race.

But if I were a betting man, I'd place the money on Mitt to 'show' (get the GOP nomination) but on Obama to 'win' in the end.

Does that meet your criteria as an acceptable response in terms of a 'data point' in your survey?




Avatar

OCU


 - - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Hi Gang
By: wilful in FFFT
Sun, 29 Jan 12 3:07 AM 		Msg. 38468 of 65535

Lemme try this another way: which of the four would get the most votes, for the Republican candidate (even assuming - if you wish - an overall loss).. i.e. were Ron Paul the candidate - he would get the least. Am looking for the opposite of that.


« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next