clo,
It does nothing of the sort. It's a pretty lousy video.
To get you to understand, I'd need to explain the difference between "it shows no blood or bruises" and "it does not show blood or bruises." I'm not going to do that. As I recall, you're still one of those who thinks GWB's incorrect belief that WMDs were in Iraq constituted a LIE. If you never grasped why it wasn't, you aren't going to understand my point now.
But, of the two quotes, the latter is the correct one. The explanation is that it is a poor video, and not all injuries necessarily bleed. I'm sure there will be some evidence to back up the police's claim that he was injured. They had no reason to lie.
This story is no longer of interest to me. It is not a hate crime and, in the great scheme of things, it's not really a very interesting event. It was funny for a while, but it's time to move on.
I'm resigned to the fact, however, that the left desperately WANTS to manufacture a hate crime out of nothing so they won't look like such complete buffoons for having, ONCE AGAIN, demonstrated their utter incompetence at interpreting world events. I understand. You gotta do what you gotta do.