-Person A labled Person B a f...ing coon on the 911 call.
No he didn't. Go listen to the call. Not only does it require considerable audio enhancement AND imagination on the part of the listener, but the statement doesn't even seem in context for that part of the phone call. It would be a very weird thing for him to have popped up with something like that in that part of the conversation.
-Person A called 911 50 times this year,
Person A was a neighborhood watch captain. The captains are the ones that the neighbors bring their problems to. It's very common for such officials to wind up reporting their neighborhood's complaints to the police.
My next door neighbor threw a party a couple of months ago. The next day, the neighbor across from him had tire marks (a 360) in his lawn. Guess who had to deal with the complaint? The neighborhood watch captain. IT IS WHAT THEY DO. They have the special relationship with the police and the training.
If you've heard any of police criticizing George Zimmerman for his frequent phone calls, please let me know and provide the link. But I think the answer is that you haven't.
-Person A seems to find many people acting 'suspciously.'
Where's your evidence for that? The phone call count above?
I'll point out, btw, that his neighborhood had experienced a rash of burglaries. I'm sure glad MY neighborhood hasn't. I think that would make everyone paranoid.
-Person A has a history of violence & was arrested several times.
No argument. But, weeks before, a cousin had tweeted Person B about Person B having punched a bus driver. Person B had been caught with drugs. Person B had been caught with burglary tools. Person B had been caught with a bag of women's jewelry - and I think it's safe to call it obviously STOLEN jewelry.
So we're talking about TWO real winners here, aren't we?
-Person B has a clean record with the law.
But probably only because he's young. Everyone STARTS with a clean record. Had he been caught by cops instead of school officials, his record wouldn't have been clean.
-Person A is alive, no stitches.
I don't think we know that - about the stitches. Early on, I read that his head wound had been stitched shut.
I was once hit in the head by a baseball bat. Small cut. Two stitches. Head wounds bleed profusely. If that thing we saw in the photo I posted was actually a head wound, it HAD to have been stitched up or he'd have bled to death.
As for Person A being alive... yes. He's the one who used a gun. Since defending oneself with a permitted gun is legal and since what we don't know is whether he WAS defending himself with it, you aren't adding anything meaningful to this discussion.
-Person B is dead.....
Again, that's obvious. But was it murder, or defense? It could be EITHER. clo.
There. Every one of your points was just explained away or shot down. Do you have any more?
Gold is $1,581/oz today. When it hits $2,000, it will be up 26.5%. Let's see how long that takes. - De 3/11/2013 - ANSWER: 7 Years, 5 Months
| 
