« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Romney Argues Big Spending Cuts Would Cause 'Depression,' Contrary To Tea Party Activists

By: zzstar in FFFT | Recommend this post (0)
Mon, 28 May 12 1:26 AM | 90 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought
Msg. 42574 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 42564 by clo)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Romney meets ....Obama.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Romney Argues Big Spending Cuts Would Cause 'Depression,' Contrary To Tea Party Activists
By: clo
in FFFT
Sun, 27 May 12 6:09 PM
Msg. 42564 of 65535

Romney Argues Big Spending Cuts Would Cause 'Depression,' Contrary To Tea Party Activists

.....

Romney, however, said that pushing drastic spending cuts during shaky economic times is a prescription for "recession or depression." 

Asked by Time's Mark Halperin Wednesday why he wouldn't push major cuts in his first year, Romney responded with reasoning that would be largely uncontroversial if not for the past two years' mainstreaming of an economic philosophy that insists government spending actually costs jobs, rather than creates job.

"Well because, if you take a trillion dollars for instance, out of the first year of the federal budget, that would shrink GDP over 5 percent. That is by definition throwing us into recession or depression. So I'm not going to do that, of course," Romney said in an answer picked up by former bank regulator William Black, a HuffPost blogger.

Boehner, by contrast, said cutting spending will spur the economy by giving "certainty" to the business community. "It would lift this cloud of uncertainty that's causing employers to wonder what's next. So dealing with our debt and our deficit are critically important," he said.

Any spending cuts, Romney said, should come down the road, after the economy has improved.

"I don't want to have us go into a recession in order to balance the budget," he said. "I'd like to have us have high rates of growth at the same time we bring down federal spending, on, if you will, a ramp that’s affordable, but that does not cause us to enter into a economic decline."

Romney's reasoning accepts the basic premise that government spending adds to GDP and leads to economic growth, at least during times when consumer spending and private-sector demand is down.

The economic assertion is supported by the post-recession job creation numbers. Under President Obama, government spending has grown at its slowest rate since the Eisenhower Administration, according to Politifact. Predictably, that has led to a slower recovery and -- ironically for a president who called for belt-tightening as a political response to the Tea Party -- political trouble for his reelection.

In fact, adjusting for inflation, Obama has actually cut spending by 0.1 percent, according to a Politifact analysis.

more:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/25/romney-spending-cuts-depression-tea-party_n_1545933.html


« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next