Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Is it really real? 

By: Zimbler0 in POPE | Recommend this post (2)
Mon, 04 Jun 12 11:14 PM | 59 view(s)
Boardmark this board | (The) Pope's for real stock market report 		Msg. 59859 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 59848 by Decomposed)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Decomposed> When given such a lengthy list, they know they don't have the answers and back away. Happens every time.


Nope.
Oh, 'they' do back away from it . . but not because
they realize they can not answer. . . . but because
they figure its not worth their time to try to
'explain' what they believe is obvious.

KillTheCat occasionally posts a long diatribe of
'garbage' . . . I could spend a week rebuting it
point by point but it would do no good. A week
later he'd post the same garbage.

>>>
I'm sorry its length is intimidating. But G.W.
is a very complicated subject that most liberals
choose to oversimplify.
>>>

True enough.
If one makes a decision based upon a lie, one will
make a bad decision.

So, I apply the following test.
Is what 'they' propose really a solution?
Or is it using the 'problem' as an excuse to steal?

A carbon tax on me with obama giving the money
collected to 'poor people' is not a solution - at
best it shifts the carbon usage from the middle
class who deserve it to the 'poor' who don't.

Was it Kyoto? Europe and N. America were supposed to
reduce our carbon emmissions . . . While China is
radically increasing theirs.

Neither was a 'solution' . . . . and anybody who
champions either is a thieving turd.

Simple enough.

Zim.




Avatar

Mad Poet Strikes Again.


 - - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Is it really real?
By: Decomposed in POPE
Mon, 04 Jun 12 10:53 PM 		Msg. 59848 of 65535

re: "Your list is too long. But, I am in agreement with you."


Zimbler,

My list is long because there are a LOT of questions that aren't being answered (or even asked) about G.W. If the list were shorter, that would suggest that there aren't really all that many things that need to be resolved before proceeding to the legislation. Even one of these questions, left unanswered or answered improperly, could make legislation the WRONG answer.

Think about that.

I'm sorry its length is intimidating. But G.W. is a very complicated subject that most liberals choose to oversimplify. When given such a lengthy list, they know they don't have the answers and back away. Happens every time.

Yet they claim to know that manmade global warming is really occurring - and that Americans must act. And that those who don't buy into it as well are ignorant.

The list isn't a tenth as long as it could and actually should be.

« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next